Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34355393›Full record

ArticleFamily process2022

Family and individual risk factors for triangulation: Evaluating evidence for emotion coaching buffering effects.

Devin M McCauley, Gregory M Fosco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family process, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Devin M McCauleyHuman Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0794-9433
Gregory M FoscoHuman Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8962-915X

Funding

PREVENTION AND METHODOLOGY TRAINING (PAMT)T32DA017629 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI Eric D Claus, Rina D Eiden · 2005 to 2026
$9.5M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA017629
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescents who are triangulated into interparental conflict are at increased risk for psychological maladjustment. However, little is known about factors that may predict family risk for triangulating adolescents, or protective factors that can off-set this risk. In this study, we conducted longitudinal tests of family, parent, and adolescent factors that might predict increases in triangulation over time. The sample included 174 adolescents and their mother figures from two-parent families (58% female; M

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorMentoringAdolescentEmotionsFamily ConflictFemaleHumansMaleParent-Child RelationsParentsRisk FactorsAdolescenceEmotion CoachingGender DifferencesInterparental ConflictTriangulation

Identifiers

PMID34355393
PMCPMC8816974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.