Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34355348›Full record

SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2022

Effects of Physicians' Information Giving on Patient Outcomes: a Systematic Review.

Hanne C Lie, Lene K Juvet, Richard L Street, Pål Gulbrandsen, Anneli V Mellblom, Espen Andreas Brembo, Hilde Eide, Lena Heyn, Kristina H Saltveit, Hilde Strømme and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Team Approach to Patient-Centered Communication in the Emergency Department.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Barriers of physician-patient relationships in professionalism: A qualitative study.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hanne C Lie *Department of Behavioral Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Lene K Juvet *Centre for Health and Technology, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.
Richard L StreetDepartment of Communication, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Pål GulbrandsenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anneli V MellblomDepartment of Behavioral Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Espen Andreas BremboCentre for Health and Technology, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.
Hilde EideCentre for Health and Technology, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.
Lena HeynCentre for Health and Technology, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.
Kristina H SaltveitDepartment of Behavioral Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Hilde StrømmeLibrary of Medicine and Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Vibeke SundlingCentre for Health and Technology, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.
Eva TurkCentre for Health and Technology, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.
Julia MenichettiInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. j.p.m.delor@medisin.uio.no.ORCID 0000-0002-9445-987X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviding diagnostic and treatment information to patients is a core clinical skill, but evidence for the effectiveness of different information-giving strategies is inconsistent. This systematic review aimed to investigate the reported effects of empirically tested communication strategies for providing information on patient-related outcomes: information recall and (health-related) behaviors.

methodsThe databases MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO (Ovid), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and relevant bibliographies were systematically searched from the inception to April 24, 2020, without restrictions, for articles testing information-giving strategies for physicians (PROSPERO ID: CRD42019115791). Pairs of independent reviewers identified randomized controlled studies with a low risk of selection bias as from the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool. Main outcomes were grouped into patient information recall and behavioral outcomes (e.g., alcohol consumption, weight loss, participation in screening). Due to high heterogeneity in the data on effects of interventions, these outcomes were descriptively reported, together with studies', interventions', and information-giving strategies' characteristics. PRISMA guidelines were followed.

resultsSeventeen of 9423 articles were included. Eight studies, reporting 10 interventions, assessed patient information recall: mostly conducted in experimental settings and testing a single information-giving strategy. Four of the ten interventions reported significant increase in recall. Nine studies assessed behavioral outcomes, mostly in real-life clinical settings and testing multiple information-giving strategies simultaneously. The heterogeneity in this group of studies was high. Eight of the nine interventions reported a significant positive effect on objectively and subjectively measured patients' behavioral outcomes. DISCUSSION: Using specific framing strategies for achieving specific communication goals when providing information to patients appears to have positive effects on information recall and patient health-related behaviors. The heterogeneity observed in this group of studies testifies the need for a more consistent methodological and conceptual agenda when testing medical information-giving strategies.

trial registrationPROSPERO registration number: CRD42019115791.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorPhysiciansAlcohol DrinkingCommunicationHumansbehavioral changeinformation recallmedical communicationmedical informationsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34355348
PMCPMC8858343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.