ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2022
PET-Uptake Reduction into Lymph Nodes After Neoadjuvant Therapy is Highly Predictive of Prognosis for Patients Who have Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Chemoradiotherapy Plus Esophagectomy.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning model for the prediction of lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using MIP FDG-PET images: a retrospective validation study.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with
methodsOf 129 TESCC patients with clinical lymphatic metastasis who underwent curative-intent esophagectomy after NACRT between 2010 and 2018, 97 who received PET before and after NACRT were enrolled in the study. The study defined lymph nodes with a maximum standardized uptake value (SUV
resultsNo significant difference in survival was detected between the cPET-N(+) and cPET-N(-) patients. However, the CRT-cPET-N(-) patients had significantly better 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) than the CRT-cPET-N (+) patients. The PET-N responders had significantly better 5-year OS and DSS than the PET-N non-responders, and PET-N response was an independent prognostic factor for 5-year DSS.
conclusionThe PET-N response is a highly predictive prognostic marker for TESCC patients who undergo NACRT followed by esophagectomy. The PET-N response may help clinicians to establish a strategy for perioperative treatments that improves survival for patients with lymph node metastasis in TESCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.