Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34355295›Full record

ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2022

Perception and Production of Statement-Question Intonation in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Developmental Investigation.

Li Wang, C Philip Beaman, Cunmei Jiang, Fang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Li WangSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5318-2408
C Philip BeamanSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK.
Cunmei JiangMusic College, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Fang LiuSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK. f.liu@reading.ac.uk.

Funding

European Research Council ERC-StG-2015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prosody or "melody in speech" in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is often perceived as atypical. This study examined perception and production of statements and questions in 84 children, adolescents and adults with and without ASD, as well as participants' pitch direction discrimination thresholds. The results suggested that the abilities to discriminate (in both speech and music conditions), identify, and imitate statement-question intonation were intact in individuals with ASD across age cohorts. Sensitivity to pitch direction predicted performance on intonation processing in both groups, who also exhibited similar developmental changes. These findings provide evidence for shared mechanisms in pitch processing between speech and music, as well as associations between low- and high-level pitch processing and between perception and production of pitch.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderMusicSpeech PerceptionAdolescentAdultChildHumansPitch DiscriminationPitch PerceptionSpeechAutism spectrum disorderIntonationMusicPitchSpeech

Identifiers

PMID34355295
PMCPMC9296411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.