Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34355284›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2021

Students' attitudes toward digital learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey conducted following an online course in gynecology and obstetrics.

Gregor Leonhard Olmes, Julia Sarah Maria Zimmermann, Lisa Stotz, Ferenc Zoltan Takacs, Amr Hamza, Marc Philipp Radosa, Sebastian Findeklee, Erich-Franz Solomayer, Julia Caroline Radosa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gregor Leonhard OlmesDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, HomburgSaar, Germany. gregor.olmes@uks.eu.
Julia Sarah Maria ZimmermannDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, HomburgSaar, Germany.
Lisa StotzDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, HomburgSaar, Germany.
Ferenc Zoltan TakacsDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, HomburgSaar, Germany.
Amr HamzaDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, HomburgSaar, Germany.
Marc Philipp RadosaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Bremen-Nord, Bremen, Germany.
Sebastian FindekleeDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, HomburgSaar, Germany.
Erich-Franz SolomayerDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, HomburgSaar, Germany.
Julia Caroline RadosaDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, HomburgSaar, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this survey was to assess medical students' opinions about online learning programs and their preferences for specific teaching formats during COVID 19 pandemic.

methodsBetween May and July 2020, medical students who took an online gynecology and obstetrics course were asked to fill in a questionnaire anonymously. The questionnaire solicited their opinions about the course, the teaching formats used (online lectures, video tutorials featuring real patient scenarios, and online practical skills training), and digital learning in general.

resultsOf 103 students, 98 (95%) submitted questionnaires that were included in the analysis. 84 (86%) students had no problem with the online course and 70 (72%) desired more online teaching in the future. 37 (38%) respondents preferred online to traditional lectures. 72 (74%) students missed learning with real patients. All digital teaching formats received good and excellent ratings from > 80% of the students.

conclusionThe survey results show medical students' broad acceptance of the online course during COVID 19 pandemic and indicates that digital learning options can partially replace conventional face-to-face teaching. For content taught by lecture, online teaching might be an alternative or complement to traditional education. However, bedside-teaching remains a key pillar of medical education.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, DistanceEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleGynecologyHumansMaleObstetricsPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Students, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesCorona virusDigital learningGynecology and obstetricsMedical educationOnline teaching

Identifiers

PMID34355284
PMCPMC8341044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.