Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34355232›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2022

Predictors of Lack of Relapse After Random Discontinuation of Oral and Long-acting Injectable Antipsychotics in Clinically Stabilized Patients with Schizophrenia: A Re-analysis of Individual Participant Data.

Georgios Schoretsanitis, John M Kane, Christoph U Correll, Jose M Rubio

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Helping people to discontinue antipsychotics: if, when and how.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia: How far have we come?PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Georgios SchoretsanitisDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3851-4117
John M KaneDepartment of Psychiatry, Northwell Health, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, USA.
Christoph U CorrellDepartment of Psychiatry, Northwell Health, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, USA.
Jose M RubioDepartment of Psychiatry, Northwell Health, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, NY, USA.
Northwell Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo quantify the risk and predictors of relapse among individuals with schizophrenia randomly withdrawn from antipsychotic maintenance treatment.

methodsWe re-analyzed time-to-event and baseline predictors from placebo arms in five placebo-controlled randomized trials of antipsychotics (n = 688 individuals; 173 stabilized on oral antipsychotic [OAP] and 515 on long-acting injectables [LAI]) for relapse-prevention available in the Yale Open Data Access repository. Using a survival and Cox-proportional hazards regression analyses, we estimated survival rates of "relapse-free" individuals by the end of follow-up (median = 118 days, IQR = 52.0-208.0), the rate of study-confirmed relapse, and adjusted hazard ratios (aHR, 95% confidence intervals [CI]) associated with baseline predictors. We also estimated these parameters for individuals followed for >5 half-lives of the stabilizing antipsychotic, and studied predictors of "rebound psychosis" in OAP-stabilized participants, defined as occurring within 30 days of antipsychotic withdrawal.

results29.9% (95%CI = 23.2-38.5) remained relapse-free by the end of follow-up, 11.1% (95%CI = 5.65-21.9) among those OAP-stabilized, 36.4% (95%CI = 28.4-46.7) among those LAI-stabilized. The study-confirmed relapse rate was 45.2%, 62.4% among those OAP-stabilized and 39.4% among those LAI-stabilized. Predictors of relapse included smoking (aHR = 1.54, 95%CI = 1.19-2.00), female sex (aHR = 1.37, 95%CI = 1.08-1.79), and having been stabilized on OAPs vs LAIs (aHR = 3.56, 95%CI = 2.68-4.72). Greater risk of relapse on OAP persisted even after sufficient time had elapsed to clear antipsychotic plasma level among LAI-stabilized (aHR = 5.0, 95%CI = 3.5-7.1). "Rebound psychosis" did not show predictors. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our results corroborate the high relapse risk following antipsychotic withdrawal after symptom stabilization with limited patient-related predictors of safe treatment discontinuation. Stabilization with LAIs reduces the short-/medium-term relapse risk.

Indexed as

RecurrenceAdministration, OralAdultAntipsychotic AgentsDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsSchizophreniaAntipsychotic Agentsantipsychoticsindividual participant datalong-acting injectablesrelapseschizophreniawithdrawal

Identifiers

PMID34355232
PMCPMC8886604
OpenAlexW3191401003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.