Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34355173›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Distinct difference in tumor-infiltrating immune cells between Wilms' tumor gene 1 peptide vaccine and anti-programmed cell death-1 antibody therapies.

Chisato Yokota, Jun Nakata, Koji Takano, Hiroko Nakajima, Hiromu Hayashibara, Hikaru Minagawa, Yasuyoshi Chiba, Ryuichi Hirayama, Noriyuki Kijima, Manabu Kinoshita and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chisato YokotaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Jun NakataDepartment of Clinical Laboratory and Biomedical Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Koji TakanoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Osaka, Japan.
Hiroko NakajimaDepartment of Cancer Immunology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Hiromu HayashibaraDepartment of Clinical Laboratory and Biomedical Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Hikaru MinagawaDepartment of Pediatrics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Yasuyoshi ChibaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka Women's and Children's Hospital, Osaka, Izumi, Japan.
Ryuichi HirayamaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Noriyuki KijimaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Manabu KinoshitaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7923-6902
Yoshiko HashiiDepartment of Cancer Immunotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Akihiro TsuboiDepartment of Cancer Immunotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshihiro OkaDepartment of Cancer Stem Cell Biology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Yusuke OjiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory and Biomedical Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Atsushi KumanogohDepartment of Respiratory Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Haruo SugiyamaDepartment of Cancer Immunology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Naoki KagawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Haruhiko KishimaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
The University of Osaka · JPOsaka International Cancer Institute · JPOsaka Women's and Children's Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWilms' tumor gene 1 (WT1) peptide vaccine and anti-programmed cell death-1 (anti-PD-1) antibody are expected as immunotherapies to improve the clinical outcome of glioblastoma. The aims of this study were to clarify how each immunotherapy affects tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIIs) and to determine whether the combination of these two therapies could synergistically work.

methodsMice were transplanted with WT1 and programmed cell death-ligand 1 doubly expressing glioblastoma cells into brain followed by treatment with WT1 peptide vaccine, anti-PD-1 antibody, or the combination of the two, and survival of each therapy was compared. CD45

resultsMost mice seemed to be cured by the combination therapy with WT1 peptide vaccine and anti-PD-1 antibody, which was much better survival than each monotherapy. A large number of CD4

conclusionOur results clearly demonstrated that WT1 peptide vaccine and anti-PD-1 antibody therapies worked in the different steps of cancer-immunity cycle and that the combination of the two therapies could work synergistically against glioblastoma.

Indexed as

cancer vaccinecombination therapyglioblastomaimmunotherapyPD-1WT1

Identifiers

PMID34355173
PMCPMC8331049
OpenAlexW3176093926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.