Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34355154›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2021

Incidental findings on brain MR imaging of asymptomatic term neonates in the Developing Human Connectome Project.

Olivia Carney, Emer Hughes, Nora Tusor, Ralica Dimitrova, Sophie Arulkumaran, Kelly Pegoretti Baruteau, Alexia Egloff Collado, Lucilio Cordero-Grande, Andrew Chew, Shona Falconer and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Olivia CarneyCentre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Emer HughesCentre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nora TusorCentre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ralica DimitrovaCentre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sophie ArulkumaranCentre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Kelly Pegoretti BaruteauCentre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alexia Egloff ColladoCentre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lucilio Cordero-GrandeCentre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew ChewCentre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Shona FalconerCentre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Joanna M AllsopCentre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel RueckertBiomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Joseph HajnalCentre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
A David EdwardsCentre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mary RutherfordCentre for the Developing Brain, Department of Perinatal Imaging and Health, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
King's College London · GBInstitute of Group Analysis · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N026063/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterpretation of incidental findings on term neonatal MRI brain imaging can be challenging as there is a paucity of published normative data on asymptomatic term neonates. Reporting radiologists and clinicians need to be familiar with these incidental findings to avoid over-investigation and misinterpretation particularly in relation to neurodevelopmental outcome. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of incidental findings in a large group of asymptomatic term neonates participating in the Developing Human Connectome Project (dHCP) who were invited for neurodevelopmental assessment at 18 months.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed MRI brain scans performed on 500 term neonates enrolled in the dHCP study between 2015 and 2019 with normal clinical examination. We reviewed the results of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Bayley III) applied to participants who attended for neurodevelopmental follow-up at 18 months. Scores considered "delayed" if <70 on language, cognitive or motor scales.

findingsIncidental findings were observed in 47% of term infants. Acute cerebral infarcts were incidentally noted in five neonates (1%). More common incidental findings included punctate white matter lesions (PWMLs) (12%) and caudothalamic subependymal cysts (10%). The most frequent incidental finding was intracranial haemorrhage (25%), particularly subdural haemorrhage (SDH). SDH and PWMLs were more common in infants delivered with ventouse-assistance versus other delivery methods.Neurodevelopmental results were available on 386/500 (77%). 14 infants had a language score < 70 (2 SD below the mean). Of the 386 infants with neurodevelopmental follow up at 18 months, group differences in motor and language scores between infants with and without incidental findings were not significant (

interpretationIncidental findings are relatively common on brain MRI in asymptomatic term neonates, majority are clinically insignificant with normal neurodevelopment at 18 months.

fundingThis work was supported by the European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/20072013/ERC grant agreement no. [319456] dHCP project), by core funding from the Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Medical Engineering [WT203148/Z/16/Z] and by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London and/or the NIHR Clinical Research Facility. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Identifiers

PMID34355154
PMCPMC8322308
OpenAlexW3183313404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.