Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34355054›Full record

ArticleJPRAS open2021

The Utility of Smartphone 3D Scanning, Open-Sourced Computer-aided Design, and Desktop 3D Printing in the Surgical Planning of Microtia Reconstruction: a Step by Step Guide and Concept Assessment.

Abdualziz Alazzam, Sultan Aljarba, Feras Alshomer, Bassam Alawirdhi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPRAS open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The cutting edge of customized surgery: 3D-printed models for patient-specific interventions in otology and auricular management-a systematic review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abdualziz AlazzamPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Division, Surgery department, Ministry of National Guards Health Affairs, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sultan AljarbaKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Feras AlshomerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery Division, Surgery department, Ministry of National Guards Health Affairs, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Bassam AlawirdhiDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMicrotia, a congenital anomaly of the auricle with a wide spectrum of presentation with challenging reconstruction. Management depends on its severity with variable reconstructive options. Preoperative planning is crucial to achieve better results and decrease operative time. In this article, we aim to show the utility of an affordable technology with the use of a smartphone, an open-source computer-aided design (CAD) software, and a desktop 3D printer in planning future ear location for unilateral microtia reconstruction in step-by-step fashion. METHODOLOGY: Facial 3D scanning was done using a smartphone that has a three-dimensional capture system. The scan was then used in an open-sourced CAD software. A mirror image mask was created by reflecting normal side anatomic features to the abnormal side. The mask constitutes the desired area for reconstruction given the ear anthropometrics. Finally, the model was 3D printed and fitted to the patient in which incision marking and framework location was planned. DISCUSSION: Ear reconstruction requires careful assessment and specific technicality in its anthropometric measures. One important aspect in surgical planning resides in future ear location that varies between person to person. This variability makes the reconstructive option more customized based on the patient's needs. The utility of CAD software in the measurement and planning can help predict and optimize postoperative results as possible; however, it has major technical demands and added surgical fees.

conclusionHerein, we demonstrate the efficacy of an easy-to-use system beneficial for preoperative planning that is affordable, time-saving, and cost effective.

Indexed as

Computer-aided designMicrotiaReconstructionScannerSmartphoneThree-dimensional printing

Identifiers

PMID34355054
PMCPMC8321891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.