Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34354894›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Evaluation of Medication Errors in a Tertiary Care Hospital of a Low- to Middle-Income Country.

Ashwaghosha Parthasarathi, Rahul Puvvada, Himanshu Patel, Pooja Bhandari, Sagar Nagpal

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Epidemiology of Medication Errors in Indian Hospital Settings: A Systematic Literature Review.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Benchmarking of medication incidents reporting and medication error rates in a JCI accredited university teaching hospital at a GCC country.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Ashwaghosha ParthasarathiEpidemiology and Public Health, Allergy, Asthma and Chest Centre, Mysore, IND.
Rahul PuvvadaPhysiology, Anatomy, and Microbiology, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Melbourne, AUS.
Himanshu PatelPharmacology and Therapeutics, International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners, North Vancouver, CAN.
Pooja BhandariPublic Health, Madhavnagar Government Hospital, Ujjain, IND.
Sagar NagpalInternal Medicine, Erie County Medical Center, Buffalo, USA.
Erie County Medical Center · USAllergy, Asthma and Clinical Research Center · USLa Trobe University · AUVancouver Native Health Society · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Medication errors (MEs) are a major public health concern as they are detrimental to patient safety, compromise patients' confidence in the healthcare system, increase healthcare costs, and adversely affect the patient's quality of life. This is especially true in low to middle-income countries where the significance of MEs is largely undervalued. This study aims to investigate the prevalence of MEs and analyze the causes, medicines involved, reporting, and severity of MEs in a tertiary care setting. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted from March 2020 to February 2021 in a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India. The data was collected after reviewing patient medical records, by interviewing patients and healthcare professionals. National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP) index was used to evaluate MEs. Results A total of 557 MEs were identified from 3798 patients with a prevalence of 14.6%. Prescribing errors were the most commonly observed ME followed by errors related to documentation of medical records, administration-related errors, and dispensing errors. Lack of time for documentation of medication records, shift change and work overload were common causes of MEs. The majority of MEs were category A and B of the NCC MERP severity index. Conclusion Antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors were the most common medicines involved in MEs. Prescribing and documentation errors were most prevalent. Implementation of systems like strict adherence to treatment guidelines, computerized provider order entry (CPOE), barcode medication administration, and closed-loop electronic medication management systems may greatly help reduce MEs. All healthcare institutions should undertake routine audits to determine the prevalence and causes of medication errors.

Indexed as

administration errorscauses of medication errorsdispensing errorsmedication errorsmedication safetypatient safetyprescribing errors

Identifiers

PMID34354894
PMCPMC8328840
OpenAlexW3191292889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.