Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34354880›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

When is Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Useful in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ? The Experience at a Latin American Cancer Center.

Sandra E Diaz Casas, Wilmar A Serrano Muñoz, Nelson A Buelvas Gómez, Ana M Osorio Ruiz, Javier Ángel Aristizábal, Luis H Guzmán Abisaab, Mauricio Garcia Mora, Carlos Lehmann Mosquera, Sergio Cervera-Bonilla, Ricardo Sanchez Pedraza

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandra E Diaz CasasBreast and Soft Tissue Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá D.C, COL.
Wilmar A Serrano MuñozBreast Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá D.C, COL.
Nelson A Buelvas GómezBreast and Soft Tissue Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá D.C, COL.
Ana M Osorio RuizBreast Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá D.C, COL.
Javier Ángel AristizábalBreast and Soft Tissue Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá D.C, COL.
Luis H Guzmán AbisaabBreast Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá D.C, COL.
Mauricio Garcia MoraBreast and Soft Tissue Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá D.C, COL.
Carlos Lehmann MosqueraBreast and Soft Tissue Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá D.C, COL.
Sergio Cervera-BonillaBreast and Soft Tissue Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá D.C, COL.
Ricardo Sanchez PedrazaEpidemiology and Public Health, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá D.C, COL.
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) accounts for 15% of breast cancers. Surgery is the main treatment, and the use of sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) is restricted to patients at risk of infiltration, which is estimated to be around 26%. Materials and methods Aimed at evaluating the benefit of SLNB in patients with DCIS at the Breast and Soft Tissue Functional Unit of the National Cancer Institute (INC for its initials in Spanish), a descriptive observational study of a retrospective cases series was conducted between August 1, 2013, and September 30, 2018. Results A total of 40 patients with a median age of 57 years were included in the study; 62.5% of them underwent mastectomy with SLNB, and the remaining 37.5% underwent conservative surgery with SLNB. 100% of sentinel nodes were identified, by using lymphoscintigraphy in 95%. Sentinel node was positive in four patients (10%), three of whom had infiltration in the surgical specimen reported. With a follow-up of 49 months, only one patient had a local relapse. None of the patients had axillary or distant recurrence. Conclusions SLNB in DCIS should be limited to patients with risk factors for infiltration (tumor size greater than 3 cm, comedo-type histology, and high-grade DCIS), and patients with an indication for mastectomy. Its percentage of complications is low, and a high identification percentage in surgical groups with adequate training.

Indexed as

axillary lymph nodesbreast carcinoma in situductal carcinoma in situlymph node metastasessentinel node biopsy

Identifiers

PMID34354880
PMCPMC8327396
OpenAlexW3184745876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.