Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34354725›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021

Comparing Exogenous Methods to Induce Plant-Resistance Against a Bark-Feeding Insect.

Yayuan Chen, Adriana Puentes, Christer Björkman, Agnès Brosset, Helena Bylund

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Yayuan ChenDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala, Sweden.
Adriana PuentesDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala, Sweden.
Christer BjörkmanDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala, Sweden.
Agnès BrossetDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala, Sweden.
Helena BylundDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala, Sweden.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exogenous application of the plant hormone methyl jasmonate (MeJA) can trigger induced plant defenses against herbivores, and has been shown to provide protection against insect herbivory in conifer seedlings. Other methods, such as mechanical damage to seedlings, can also induce plant defenses, yet few have been compared to MeJA and most studies lack subsequent herbivory feeding tests. We conducted two lab experiments to: (1) compare the efficacy of MeJA to mechanical damage treatments that could also induce seedling resistance, (2) examine if subsequent insect damage differs depending on the time since induction treatments occurred, and (3) assess if these induction methods affect plant growth. We compared Scots pine (

Indexed as

forest regenerationmethyl jasmonateroot damagesimulated herbivorytrue insect herbivorywounding

Identifiers

PMID34354725
PMCPMC8329535
OpenAlexW3183936530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.