ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2021
Rapid analytical method for the determination of 220 pesticide with their isomers by GCMS-TIC.
Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Post translational modifications as biomarkers of soil microbe responses to nano-pesticides.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Recent progress in functional materials for electrochemical detection of pesticides: modification strategies, performance, and future challenges.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a cost-effective and validated multi residue modified and miniaturized method for the determination of 220 chemically different groups of pesticides and their isomers. This determination method is performed with single Quaid Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry -Total Ion Chromatogram GCMS-TIC. Two methods was experimented and modified with different GCMS parameters to analyses most common used pesticide and their residues in the standers solution and can be applied for real environmental samples. The results showed by single Quaid GCMS-TIC it can analyze 220 pesticides including their isomers within 49.6 min and low detection limit by using modified method 2 as described in this research. Limit of detection (LOD) was ranged from 0.78 to 14.74 ng/ml (ppb) with good separation and resolution. Limit of quantification (LOQ) was ranged between 2.34 and 44.22 ng/ml (ppb). Method 2 was more accurate, shorter, and clear separation rather than method 1. This method can be successfully applied in real environmental samples proven to be a good option for routine analysis of pesticide within the maximum residue limits (MRL) referenced to European commission especially with the most common GCMS-TIC which exists in most of labs and low income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.