Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34354373›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2021

Effects of Dorsal Column Spinal Cord Stimulation on Neuroinflammation: Revisiting Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Outcomes on Chronic Lumbar/Leg Pain and Failed Back Surgery Syndrome.

Marco Echeverria-Villalobos, Justin Mitchell, Juan Fiorda-Diaz, Tristan Weaver

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05373654 (Observational, Prospective, Monocentric Study, Assessing the Use of Rechargeable Spinal Cord Stimulators for the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain. Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation Protocol), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05373654 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Observational, Prospective, Monocentric Study, Assessing the Use of Rechargeable Spinal Cord Stimulators for the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain. Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorElsanRan2023 to 2023Enrolled50ConditionsNeuropathic PainArmsF-SUS Questionnaire, Interview (only for dissatisfied patients)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marco Echeverria-VillalobosDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Justin MitchellCollege of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Juan Fiorda-DiazDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Tristan WeaverDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn this narrative review, we reviewed and discussed current literature describing the molecular mechanisms leading to neuroinflammation and its role in the onset and progression of chronic neuropathic lumbar and leg pain in patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome. In addition, we reviewed the proposed mechanisms and impact of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on neuroinflammation.

methodsA broad search of current literature in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane library, Medline/Ovid, and Web of Science was performed using the following terms and their combinations: "biomarkers", "chronic back and leg pain", "cytokines", "neuroinflammation", "spinal cord stimulation (scs)," and "spinal cord modulation". We selected: 1) articles published in the English language between January 2000 and July 2020 2) preclinical and clinical data 3) case reports 4) meta-analysis and systematic reviews and 5) conference abstracts. Manuscripts not disclosing methodology or without full-text availability were excluded. DISCUSSION: SCS techniques have gradually evolved since inception to include novel methods such as burst-SCS, high frequency SCS, and differential targeted multiplexed SCS. The incidence of chronic pain after spine surgery is highly variable, with at least one third of patients developing persistent spinal pain syndrome. Novel SCS techniques have been associated with improved clinical and functional outcomes thus increasing patient quality of life.

conclusionCurrently, health care providers rely on different options and methods for SCS when treating patients with refractory chronic lumbar pain and persistent spinal pain syndrome. Nevertheless, compelling clinical trials remain necessary to elucidate the long-term benefits and mechanisms of neuromodulation of all different types of SCS.

Indexed as

biomarkerschronic back and leg paincytokinesneuroinflammationspinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

PMID34354373
PMCPMC8331196
OpenAlexW3184657803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.