Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34354334›Full record

ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Resection of Tailgut Cysts.

Ingmar F Rompen, Andreas Scheiwiller, Alain Winiger, Jürg Metzger, Jörn-Markus Gass

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Robotic resection of presacral tumors.Techniques in coloproctology · 2024
    Article
  6. Presacral tumors: A systematic review of literature.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Robotic abdominal resection of tailgut cysts - A technical note with step-by-step description.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ingmar F RompenDepartment of General Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Andreas ScheiwillerDepartment of General Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Alain WinigerDepartment of Radiology, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Jürg MetzgerDepartment of General Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
Jörn-Markus GassDepartment of General Surgery, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland.
University of Lucerne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTailgut cysts are rare remnants of the embryological hindgut. Resections are difficult to perform due to the narrow and delicate presacral space where they are usually located. Many different approaches have been described, but to date, no studies have been performed concerning robotic assisted surgery for this entity. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the feasibility and outcome parameters of the robotic anterior approach for resection of tailgut cysts and to compare our results with available literature. MATERIAL AND

methodsData was retrospectively obtained from hospital records of all patients who underwent robotic assisted resection of tailgut cysts between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2020. Outcomes include baseline characteristics, pre-operative radiological workup, operative time, intra- and postoperative complications, and histopathological results.

resultsBetween January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2020, five patients underwent robotic resection of tailgut cysts. All patients were female and mean age was 47.2 years (range 31.6-63.1 years). Only one patient reported to have local symptoms that could be attributed to the tailgut cyst. Median tumor size was 42 mm (range 30-64 mm). There was no conversion and median operating time was 235 minutes (range 184-331 minutes). Four patients had additional procedures. Intra- and postoperative complications included one intra-operative injury of the rectal wall, which was immediately oversewn, and one postoperative presacral hematoseroma with mild neurological symptoms. None of the specimens showed signs of malignant transformation in histopathological workup.

conclusionThis retrospective analysis shows that robotic resections of tailgut cysts are feasible and safe. Regarding the localization of tailgut cysts in the presacral space, the robotic assisted anterior approach is excellently suited, especially if the cysts are localized above the levator muscle. Longer operative times and higher material costs are outweighed by precise and safe preparation with a robotic platform in this delicate region and confined space. We recommend the robotic assisted anterior approach for the resection of tailgut cysts and retrorectal lesions in general.

Indexed as

CystsHamartomaLaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesMinimal invasive surgeryRetrorectal hamartomaRobotic surgeryTailgut cyst

Identifiers

PMID34354334
PMCPMC8325480
OpenAlexW3189802547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.