Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34354333›Full record

ReviewJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Robot-Assisted Thyroidectomy Versus Open Thyroidectomy in the Treatment of Well Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma.

Efstathios T Pavlidis, Kyriakos K Psarras, Nikolaos G Symeonidis, Eirini-Chrysovalantou K Martzivanou, Christina C Nikolaidou, Kalliopi E Stavrati, Theodoros E Pavlidis

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Efstathios T Pavlidis2nd Propedeutical Department of Surgery, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Kyriakos K Psarras2nd Propedeutical Department of Surgery, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Nikolaos G Symeonidis2nd Propedeutical Department of Surgery, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Eirini-Chrysovalantou K Martzivanou2nd Propedeutical Department of Surgery, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Christina C Nikolaidou2nd Propedeutical Department of Surgery, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Kalliopi E Stavrati2nd Propedeutical Department of Surgery, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Theodoros E Pavlidis2nd Propedeutical Department of Surgery, Hippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of thyroid cancer has increased worldwide during the last decade, becoming the most common endocrine malignancy and accounting for 3.8% of new cancer diagnosis. Surgical resection, namely conventional thyroidectomy, remains at the frontline of therapy, as surgical outcomes are undoubtedly successful. Minimally invasive techniques gained popularity through the years, in terms of feasibility, safety, and cosmesis. However, endoscopic approach could be characterized by some limitations concerning thyroid surgery. Robotic technology with its unique features was introduced to overcome these limitations. Since then, robotic thyroidectomy has been used for both benign and malignant thyroid disease. DATABASE: This study presents the use of robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy in well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma through an extensive review of the literature in the PubMed database, including previous meta-analyses and case series.

conclusionIn terms of oncological efficacy, morbidity, and quality of life, outcomes seem comparable in thyroid cancer patients undergoing either open or robotic thyroidectomy. Surgical completeness also appears similar. Moreover, the rates of locoregional recurrence and survival outcome at 5 years are similar between the former and the latter, thus confirming the oncological value of robotic thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer. In order for more surgeons to adopt robotic approaches several issues need to be resolved, namely: expansion of robotic thyroidectomy in treating larger well-differentiated carcinomas and neck dissection, equipment costs, and prolonged operation times.

Indexed as

RoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresThyroidectomyThyroid NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeEndoscopic thyroidectomyMinimally invasiveRobot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy (RATT)Thyroid carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID34354333
PMCPMC8325479
OpenAlexW3191503917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.