Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34354314›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2021

Legal strategies to improve physical activity in populations.

Tracy Nau, Ben J Smith, Adrian Bauman, Bill Bellew

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Multiple Tobacco Product Use Conceptual Framework: A 2021 Update on Evidence.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tracy NauThe Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Prevention Research Collaboration, University of Sydney, Charles Perkins Centre Level 6, John Hopkins Drive, Camperdown NSW 2006, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Ben J SmithThe Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Prevention Research Collaboration, University of Sydney, Charles Perkins Centre Level 6, John Hopkins Drive, Camperdown NSW 2006, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Adrian BaumanThe Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Prevention Research Collaboration, University of Sydney, Charles Perkins Centre Level 6, John Hopkins Drive, Camperdown NSW 2006, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Bill BellewThe Australian Prevention Partnership Centre, Prevention Research Collaboration, University of Sydney, Charles Perkins Centre Level 6, John Hopkins Drive, Camperdown NSW 2006, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Assembly has adopted the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommended target of achieving a 15% reduction in physical inactivity by 2030. The WHO Global Action Plan on Physical Activity provides a framework for countries to achieve this, using a systems-based approach to address the social and environmental determinants of physical inactivity. Lack of progress in many countries indicates a need to identify new ways of addressing this public health priority. WHO continues to highlight the importance of legislative and regulatory measures within the multicomponent and multisectoral action needed to reduce physical inactivity. Yet research into the role of law for addressing physical inactivity has been limited, in contrast to the legal approaches to other major noncommunicable disease risk factors such as smoking and alcohol use. Conceptual frameworks for public health law offer a method for mapping and understanding the determinants, mechanisms and outcomes of law-making for the promotion of physical activity within populations. We describe the development and application of a framework that aligns legal strategies with the WHO Global Plan policy objectives. This new framework - the Regulatory Approaches to Movement, Physical Activity, Recreation, Transport and Sport - can help policy-makers to use the untapped potential of legal interventions to support or strengthen a whole-system response for promoting physical activity. The framework illustrates the role of legal interventions to improve physical activity and identifies opportunities for research to advance understanding, implementation and evaluation of legal responses to this issue.

Indexed as

ExerciseGlobal HealthHealth PolicyLegislation as TopicPopulation HealthHealth PrioritiesHealth PromotionHumans

Identifiers

PMID34354314
PMCPMC8319864
OpenAlexW3191322693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.