Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34354311›Full record

ArticleBulletin of the World Health Organization2021

An integrated surveillance network for antimicrobial resistance, India.

Sonam Vijay, Monica Sharma, Jyoti Misri, B R Shome, Balaji Veeraraghavan, Pallab Ray, V C Ohri, Kamini Walia

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sonam VijayDivision of Epidemiology and Communicable Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Monica SharmaDivision of Epidemiology and Communicable Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Jyoti MisriDivision of Animal Science, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India.
B R ShomeMicrobial Pathogenesis and Pathogen Diversity Laboratory, Indian Council of Agricultural Research-National Institute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Disease Informatics, Bengaluru, India.
Balaji VeeraraghavanDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Pallab RayDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
V C OhriDivision of Epidemiology and Communicable Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Kamini WaliaDivision of Epidemiology and Communicable Diseases, Indian Council of Medical Research, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029, India.
Christian Medical College & Hospital · INIndian Council of Agricultural Research · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the preparedness of veterinary laboratories in India to participate in an integrated antimicrobial resistance surveillance network and to address gaps in provision identified.

methodsThe Indian Council of Medical Research and the Indian Council of Agricultural Research collaborated: (i) to select eight nationally representative veterinary microbiology laboratories whose capacity for participating in an integrated antimicrobial resistance surveillance network would be assessed using a standardized tool; (ii) to identify gaps in provision from the assessment findings; and (iii) to develop a plan, and take the necessary steps to address these gaps in consultation with participating organizations.

findingsThe main gaps in provision identified were: (i) a lack of dedicated funding for antimicrobial resistance surveillance; (ii) the absence of standard guidelines for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; (iii) a shortage of reference strains for testing and quality assurance; and (iv) the absence of mechanisms for sharing data. We addressed these gaps by creating a veterinary standard operating procedure for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, by carrying out a validation exercise to identify problems with implementing the procedure and by conducting capacity-building workshops for veterinary laboratories.

conclusionAntimicrobial resistance surveillance networks depend on the availability of accurate, quality-controlled testing. The challenges identified in creating an integrated surveillance network for India can be overcome by developing a comprehensive plan for improving laboratory capacity in human, veterinary and environmental sectors that is supported by the necessary funds. The study's findings may provide guidance for other low- and middle-income countries planning to develop a similar network.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsCapacity BuildingCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansIndiaLaboratoriesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSentinel SurveillanceAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID34354311
PMCPMC8319865
OpenAlexW3188555784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.