Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34354230›Full record

ReviewCommunications biology2021

The effect of plant domestication on host control of the microbiota.

Riccardo Soldan, Marco Fusi, Massimiliano Cardinale, Daniele Daffonchio, Gail M Preston

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Riccardo SoldanUniversity of Oxford, Department of Plant Sciences, Oxford, UK. riccardosoldan@hotmail.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2583-5840
Marco FusiEdinburgh Napier University, School of Applied Sciences, Edinburgh, UK.
Massimiliano CardinaleUniversity of Salento, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, Lecce, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1421-722X
Daniele DaffonchioKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Red Sea Research Center (RSRC), Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0947-925X
Gail M PrestonUniversity of Oxford, Department of Plant Sciences, Oxford, UK. gail.preston@plants.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3882-4438

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M011224/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R009236/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macroorganisms are colonized by microbial communities that exert important biological and ecological functions, the composition of which is subject to host control and has therefore been described as "an ecosystem on a leash". However, domesticated organisms such as crop plants are subject to both artificial selection and natural selection exerted by the agricultural ecosystem. Here, we propose a framework for understanding how host control of the microbiota is influenced by domestication, in which a double leash acts from domesticator to host and host to microbes. We discuss how this framework applies to a plant compartment that has demonstrated remarkable phenotypic changes during domestication: the seed.

Indexed as

DomesticationHost Microbial InteractionsMicrobiotaCrops, Agricultural

Identifiers

PMID34354230
PMCPMC8342519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.