ArticleScientific reports2021
Evaluation of a high-throughput, cost-effective Illumina library preparation kit.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cultivation-independent high-quality microbial genome reconstruction from environmental samples with midi-metagenomics.Genome research · 2026Article
- Neonatal jaundice and the infant gut microbiome: an integrated shotgun metagenomics and bidirectional Mendelian randomization study in Xinjiang.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Sensitive and modular amplicon sequencing of Plasmodium falciparum diversity and resistance for research and public health.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Sensitive and modular amplicon sequencing ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Biodegradation of Crude Oil and Aniline by Heavy Metal-Tolerant StrainMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Genotyping single nucleotide polymorphisms in homologous regions using multiplex kb level amplicon capture sequencing.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2024Article
- Article
- Hackflex library preparation enables low-cost metagenomic profiling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Hackflex library preparation enables low-cost metagenomic profiling.ISME communications · 2024Article
- Comparative transcriptome analysis of differentially expressed genes and pathways in male and female flowers of Fraxinus mandshurica.PloS one · 2024Article
- Efficacy in Galleria mellonella Larvae and Application Potential Assessment of a New Bacteriophage BUCT700 Extensively Lyse Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Genomic Analysis of the Serratia marcescens Bacteriophage BUCT660.Microbiology resource announcements · 2022Article
- Exploring the role of Tibetan medicinal formula Qishiwei Zhenzhu Pills (Ranasampel) against diabetes mellitus-linked cognitive impairment of db/db mice through serum pharmacochemistry and microarray data analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Library preparation for high-throughput sequencing applications is a critical step in producing representative, unbiased sequencing data. The iGenomX Riptide High Throughput Rapid Library Prep Kit purports to provide high-quality sequencing data with lower costs compared to other Illumina library kits. To test these claims, we compared sequence data quality of Riptide libraries to libraries constructed with KAPA Hyper and NEBNext Ultra. Across several single-source genome samples, mapping performance and de novo assembly of Riptide libraries were similar to conventional libraries prepared with the same DNA. Poor performance of some libraries resulted in low sequencing depth. In particular, degraded DNA samples may be challenging to sequence with Riptide. There was little cross-well plate contamination with the overwhelming majority of reads belong to the proper source genomes. The sequencing of metagenome samples using different Riptide primer sets resulted in variable taxonomic assignment of reads. Increased adoption of the Riptide kit will decrease library preparation costs. However, this method might not be suitable for degraded DNA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.