Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34354071›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Working memory representations in visual cortex mediate distraction effects.

Grace E Hallenbeck, Thomas C Sprague, Masih Rahmati, Kartik K Sreenivasan, Clayton E Curtis

6 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06175312 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Probing the Role of Feature Dimension Maps in Visual Cognition: Expt 1.1

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraRan2024 to 2025Enrolled10ConditionsBasic Science: Visual Attention in Healthy Participants, Basic Science: Neural Representations of Location, AttentionArmsStimulus properties: salience-defining feature, Stimulus properties: magnitude of salience
NCT06281457 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Probing the Role of Feature Dimension Maps in Visual Cognition: Expt 2.1

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraRan2024 to 2025Enrolled10ConditionsBasic Science: Visual Attention in Healthy Participants, Basic Science: Neural Representations of LocationArmsStimulus properties: task-defining feature
NCT06733467 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Probing the Role of Feature Dimension Maps in Visual Cognition: Expt 2.3

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraRan2023 to 2025Enrolled10ConditionsBasic Science: Visual Attention in Healthy Participants, Basic Science: Neural Representations of LocationArmsStimulus properties: remembered feature
NCT06852521 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Probing the Role of Feature Dimension Maps in Visual Cognition: Expt 3.1 (Pilot)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraRan2025 to 2027Enrolled240ConditionsBasic Science: Visual Attention in Healthy Participants, AttentionArmsStimulus Properties: Target Location, Stimulus Properties: Distractor Presence, Stimulus properties: Cue Validity
NCT06852534 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Probing the Role of Feature Dimension Maps in Visual Cognition: Expt 1.1 (Behavioral)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraRan2024 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsBasic Science: Visual Attention in Healthy Participants, AttentionArmsStimulus properties: salience-defining feature, Stimulus properties: magnitude of salience
NCT07572630 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Probing the Role of Feature Dimension Maps in Visual Cognition: Expt 2.2

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, Santa BarbaraRan2026 to 2026Enrolled12ConditionsBasic Science: Visual Attention in Healthy Participants, Basic Science: Neural Representations of LocationArmsStimulus properties: task-defining feature
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Visual field map size constrains working memory precision.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Dynamics of working memory drift and information flow across the cortical hierarchy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Bias in Visual Short-Term Memory for Motion Induced by Perceptually Suppressed Distractors.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  10. Sensory reformatting for a working visual memory.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Neural Dynamics of Reselecting Visual and Motor Contents in Working Memory after External Interference.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Grace E Hallenbeck *Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Thomas C Sprague *Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9530-2463
Masih RahmatiDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Kartik K SreenivasanDivision of Science and Mathematics, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE.ORCID 0000-0002-5103-1179
Clayton E CurtisDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA. clayton.curtis@nyu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0702-1499

Funding

Putting Priority Map Theory to the TestR01EY016407 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CURTIS, CLAYTON E · 2006 to 2023
$5.8M
TRAINING IN VISUAL NEUROSCIENCET32EY007136 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI J ANTHONY MOVSHON · 1993 to 2026
$5.3M
Deep sampling of cognitive effects in the human visual systemR01EY034118 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CLAYTON E CURTIS, Kendrick Norris Kay · 2023 to 2026
$1.9M
Neural decoding of working memoryR01EY027925 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CURTIS, CLAYTON E, MA, WEI JI · 2017 to 2020
$1.3M
Effects of behavioral priority on working memory representationsF32EY028438 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI SPRAGUE, THOMAS C · 2017 to 2018
$77k
NEI NIH HHS F32 EY028438NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016407NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027925NEI NIH HHS R01 EY034118NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the contents of working memory can be decoded from visual cortex activity, these representations may play a limited role if they are not robust to distraction. We used model-based fMRI to estimate the impact of distracting visual tasks on working memory representations in several visual field maps in visual and frontoparietal association cortex. Here, we show distraction causes the fidelity of working memory representations to briefly dip when both the memorandum and distractor are jointly encoded by the population activities. Distraction induces small biases in memory errors which can be predicted by biases in neural decoding in early visual cortex, but not other regions. Although distraction briefly disrupts working memory representations, the widespread redundancy with which working memory information is encoded may protect against catastrophic loss. In early visual cortex, the neural representation of information in working memory and behavioral performance are intertwined, solidifying its importance in visual memory.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionBrain MappingFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemory, Short-TermMiddle AgedModels, NeurologicalModels, PsychologicalPhotic StimulationTask Performance and AnalysisVisual Cortex

Identifiers

PMID34354071
PMCPMC8342709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.