Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34353977›Full record

ArticleAnatomy & cell biology2021

Radiologic evaluation of congenital anomalies of anterior and posterior arch of atlas in Omani subjects.

Ghaliya Al Hinai, Mai Al Shandoodi, Srinivasa Rao Sirasanagandla, Salwa Al Sarhani, Humoud Al Dhuhli, Sanjay Jaju, Mohamed Al Mushaiqri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomy & cell biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ghaliya Al HinaiRadiology Residency Program, Oman Medical Specialty Board, Muscat, Oman.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9173-2554
Mai Al ShandoodiCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6510-1131
Srinivasa Rao SirasanagandlaDepartment of Human and Clinical Anatomy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7261-1666
Salwa Al SarhaniDepartment of Radiology and Molecular Imaging, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5638-1215
Humoud Al DhuhliDepartment of Radiology and Molecular Imaging, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2442-496X
Sanjay JajuDepartment of Family Medicine & Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9381-1528
Mohamed Al MushaiqriDepartment of Human and Clinical Anatomy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2820-8968

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The atlas (C1) is known to present congenital anomalies in its anterior and posterior arches. The reported incidence of C1 anomalies is varied among the ethnic groups. We sought to determine the prevalence and various existing variations of C1 arch congenital anomalies in Omani subjects. This study was carried out by reviewing the cervical spine computed tomography scans of all the patients who had been referred to the Radiology Department, Sultan Qaboos University Hospital. Descriptive statistics and chi-square test were employed to analyse the data. A total of 663 subjects aged ≥18 years were included in the present study. Overall prevalence of C1 arch anomalies was 4.37% with 4.07% of isolated posterior arch anomalies, 0.3% of combined anterior and posterior arch anomalies. Among isolated posterior arch anomalies, type A and type B posterior arch defects were found in 3.77% and 0.3% of cases, respectively. Atlanto-occipital assimilation was noted in one case of total study subjects. The prevalence rate of C1 arch anomalies is relatively high in Omani subjects. The baseline data of C1 arch anomalies reported in the present study has a great impact on clinical practice, due to the fact that studying and evaluating the types of congenital anomalies helps in their accurate diagnosis and early intervention.

Indexed as

Cervical vertebraeDiagnosisPrevalenceRadiologySpine

Identifiers

PMID34353977
PMCPMC8693139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.