Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34353891›Full record

ArticleFamily medicine and community health2021

'Unfocused groups': lessons learnt amid remote focus groups in the Philippines.

Mila F Aligato, Vivienne Endoma, Jonas Wachinger, Jhoys Landicho-Guevarra, Thea Andrea Bravo, Jerric Rhazel Guevarra, Jeniffer Landicho, Shannon A McMahon, Mark Donald C Reñosa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family medicine and community health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mila F AligatoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Muntinlupa City, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0002-5862-5324
Vivienne EndomaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Muntinlupa City, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0002-0225-3939
Jonas WachingerHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5480-3138
Jhoys Landicho-GuevarraDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Muntinlupa City, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0002-0152-2658
Thea Andrea BravoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Muntinlupa City, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0003-3747-3103
Jerric Rhazel GuevarraDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Muntinlupa City, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0002-8078-4460
Jeniffer LandichoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Muntinlupa City, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0002-4261-9296
Shannon A McMahonHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany mcmahon@uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8634-9283
Mark Donald C ReñosaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Muntinlupa City, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0002-7414-7174

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has required tremendous shifts in data collection techniques. While an emerging body of research has described experiences conducting remote interviews, less attention has been paid to focus group discussions (FGDs). Herein, we present experiences conducting remote FGDs (n=9) with healthcare workers and caretakers of small children in the Philippines. We used 'Facebook Messenger Room' (FBMR), the preferred platform of participants. Despite some success, we generally encountered considerable challenges in terms of recruiting, retaining and moderating remote FGDs, particularly among caretakers of small children. Finding a quiet, private place proved unfeasible for many participants, who were juggling family demands in tight, locked down quarters. Connectivity issues and technological missteps compromised the flow of FGDs and minimised the ability to share and compare opinions. For the research team, remote FGDs resulted in a dramatic role shift for notetakers-from being passive observers to active tech supporters, chatbox referees and co-moderators (when audio disruptions occurred). Finally, we note that remote FGDs via FBMR are associated with ethical complexities, particularly as participants often chose to use their personal Facebook accounts, which can compromise anonymity. We developed and continuously refined strategies to mitigate challenges, but ultimately decided to forgo FGDs. We urge fellow researchers with more successful experiences to guide the field in terms of capturing high-quality data that respond to research questions, while also contending with privacy concerns, both in online spaces, as well as physical privacy despite lockdowns in tight quarters.

Indexed as

COVID-19Focus GroupsAdultAgedCommunicable Disease ControlHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedPhilippinesSARS-CoV-2COVID-19primary health carepublic healthqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID34353891
PMCPMC8349646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.