Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34353820›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2021

A health systems resilience research agenda: moving from concept to practice.

Dell D Saulnier, Karl Blanchet, Carmelita Canila, Daniel Cobos Muñoz, Livia Dal Zennaro, Don de Savigny, Kara N Durski, Fernando Garcia, Pauline Yongeun Grimm, Aku Kwamie and 12 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Pandemic Performance Measures of Resilience for Healthcare and Education in the Netherlands.The International journal of health planning and management · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Dell D SaulnierDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7761-0737
Karl BlanchetGeneva Centre of Humanitarian Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva and Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0498-8020
Carmelita CanilaDepartment of Health Policy and Administration, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Daniel Cobos MuñozSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Livia Dal ZennaroAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Don de SavignySwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Kara N DurskiWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1456-626X
Fernando GarciaDepartment of Health Policy and Administration, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Pauline Yongeun GrimmSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Aku KwamieAlliance For Health Policy and System Research, Geneva, Switzerland.
Daniel MaceiraDepartment of Economics, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Robert MartenAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2416-2309
Isabelle Peytremann-BridevauxUnisanté, Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Camille PoroesUnisanté, Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Valery RiddeCEPED, Institute for Research on Sustainable Development, IRD-Université de Paris, ERL INSERM SAGESUD, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9299-8266
Laurence SeematterUnisanté, Center for Primary Care and Public Health, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Barbara SternCenter for the Study of State and Society (CEDES), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Patricia SuarezCenter for the Study of State and Society (CEDES), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Gina TeddyCentre for Health Systems and Policy Research, Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration, Accra, Ghana.
Didier WernliGlobal Studies Institute, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1751-1961
Kaspar WyssSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Fabrizio TediosiSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland fabrizio.tediosi@unibas.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-8671-9400

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health system resilience, known as the ability for health systems to absorb, adapt or transform to maintain essential functions when stressed or shocked, has quickly gained popularity following shocks like COVID-19. The concept is relatively new in health policy and systems research and the existing research remains mostly theoretical. Research to date has viewed resilience as an outcome that can be measured through performance outcomes, as an ability of complex adaptive systems that is derived from dynamic behaviour and interactions, or as both. However, there is little congruence on the theory and the existing frameworks have not been widely used, which as diluted the research applications for health system resilience. A global group of health system researchers were convened in March 2021 to discuss and identify priorities for health system resilience research and implementation based on lessons from COVID-19 and other health emergencies. Five research priority areas were identified: (1) measuring and managing systems dynamic performance, (2) the linkages between societal resilience and health system resilience, (3) the effect of governance on the capacity for resilience, (4) creating legitimacy and (5) the influence of the private sector on health system resilience. A key to filling these research gaps will be longitudinal and comparative case studies that use cocreation and coproduction approaches that go beyond researchers to include policy-makers, practitioners and the public.

Indexed as

COVID-19EmergenciesGovernment ProgramsHealth PolicyHumansSARS-CoV-2health policies and all other topicshealth policyhealth systems

Identifiers

PMID34353820
PMCPMC8344286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.