Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34353805›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2021

Built environments for inpatient stroke rehabilitation services and care: a systematic literature review.

Ruby Lipson-Smith, Luis Pflaumer, Marie Elf, Sarah-May Blaschke, Aaron Davis, Marcus White, Heidi Zeeman, Julie Bernhardt

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Stakeholder Perspectives on Built Environmental Factors to Support Stroke Rehabilitation and Return to Everyday Life.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Impact of the built environment on stroke inpatient rehabilitation.British journal of neuroscience nursing · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Why hospital design matters: A narrative review of built environments research relevant to stroke care.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruby Lipson-SmithStroke, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia ruby.lipson-smith@florey.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-1702-8144
Luis PflaumerStroke, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9956-4639
Marie ElfSchool of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7044-8896
Sarah-May BlaschkeStroke, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2737-3379
Aaron DavisStroke, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1477-7406
Marcus WhiteCentre for Design Innovation, The Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorne, Melbourne, Australia.
Heidi ZeemanThe Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Meadowbrook, Queensland, Australia.
Julie BernhardtStroke, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2787-8484
Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health · AUDalarna University · SEGriffith University · AUSwinburne University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify, appraise and synthesise existing design evidence for inpatient stroke rehabilitation facilities; to identify impacts of these built environments on the outcomes and experiences of people recovering from stroke, their family/caregivers and staff.

designA convergent segregated review design was used to conduct a systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature were searched for articles published between January 2000 and November 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies investigating the impact of the built environment of inpatient rehabilitation facilities on stroke survivors, their family/caregivers and/or staff. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two authors separately completed the title, abstract, full-text screening, data extraction and quality assessment. Extracted data were categorised according to the aspect of the built environment explored and the outcomes reported. These categories were used to structure a narrative synthesis of the results from all included studies.

resultsTwenty-four articles were included, most qualitative and exploratory. Half of the included articles investigated a particular aspect of the built environment, including environmental enrichment and communal areas (n=8), bedroom design (n=3) and therapy spaces (n=1), while the other half considered the environment in general. Findings related to one or more of the following outcome categories: (1) clinical outcomes, (2) patient activity, (3) patient well-being, (4) patient and/or staff safety and (5) clinical practice. Heterogeneous designs and variables of interest meant results could not be compared, but some repeated findings suggest that attractive and accessible communal areas are important for patient activity and well-being.

conclusionsStroke rehabilitation is a unique healthcare context where patient activity, practice and motivation are paramount. We found many evidence gaps that with more targeted research could better inform the design of rehabilitation spaces to optimise care. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020158006.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationBuilt EnvironmentCaregiversHumansInpatientshealth services administration & managementrehabilitation medicinestroke medicine

Identifiers

PMID34353805
PMCPMC8344318
OpenAlexW3187093665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.