Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34353403›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2021

The prevalence and characteristics of misophonia in Ankara, Turkey: population-based study.

Cengiz Kılıç, Gökhan Öz, Kezban Burcu Avanoğlu, Songül Aksoy

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05993286 (Treatment of Misophonia), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05993286 nacompletednot on this map

Treatment of Misophonia: Comparison of Exposure and Sound Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorHacettepe UniversityRan2019 to 2021Enrolled76ConditionsMisophoniaArmsExposure Therapy, Sound Therapy, Psychoeducation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Misophonia: A Systematic Review of Current and Future Trends in This Emerging Clinical Field.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 Adults.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Article
  9. Misophonia Symptoms in Autistic Adults.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cengiz KılıçDepartment of Psychiatry, Hacettepe University, Turkey; and Stress Assessment and Research Center, Hacettepe University, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9270-8625
Gökhan ÖzStress Assessment and Research Center, Hacettepe University, Turkey.
Kezban Burcu AvanoğluStress Assessment and Research Center, Hacettepe University, Turkey; and Department of Psychiatry, Hacettepe University, Turkey.
Songül AksoyDepartment of Audiology, Hacettepe University, Turkey.
Hacettepe University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMisophonia is defined as significant distress (anger, distress or disgust) when exposed to certain sounds that would not affect most people, such as lip smacking or gum chewing. Although misophonia is common, the aetiology, prevalence and effective treatments are largely unknown.

aimsBased on our proposed diagnostic criteria, we examined the prevalence of misophonia and its relationship with clinical and demographic variables in a large representative population sample.

methodWe used a household sample (N = 541) of all residents aged >15 years, living in 300 homes randomly selected in Ankara city centre, Turkey. All participants were assessed at their homes by trained interviewers, for sociodemographic variables, misophonic sounds and related factors, using a semi-structured interview (the Misophonia Interview Schedule) developed for the current research.

resultsThe current misophonia diagnosis prevalence was 12.8% (n = 69 of 541), although 427 (78.9%) participants reported at least one sound that was distressing. The mean number of misophonic sounds was 8.6 (s.d. 8.9, range 0-44); the figure was 17.6 in those with misophonia compared with 7.3 in those without misophonia. Of those with misophonia, only 5.8% contacted services for their condition. Predictors of misophonia diagnosis included younger age, family history of misophonia and previous contact with mental health services.

conclusionsOur study showed that misophonia is common in the general population, may cause significant disruption in daily life and is undertreated. Although more evidence is needed to classify misophonia as a psychiatric disorder, our findings support others who claim that the condition belongs to the group of mental disorders.

Indexed as

decreased sound toleranceepidemiologyhyperacusisMisophoniatinnitus

Identifiers

PMID34353403
PMCPMC8358974
OpenAlexW3187919347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.