Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34353354›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2021

Association of cerebrospinal fluid protein biomarkers with outcomes in patients with traumatic and non-traumatic acute brain injury: systematic review of the literature.

Carlos A Santacruz, Jean-Louis Vincent, Andres Bader, Luis A Rincón-Gutiérrez, Claudia Dominguez-Curell, David Communi, Fabio S Taccone

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist as Therapy for Traumatic Brain Injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Carlos A SantacruzDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route De Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Jean-Louis VincentDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route De Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium. jlvincent@intensive.org.ORCID 0000-0001-6011-6951
Andres BaderDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route De Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Luis A Rincón-GutiérrezDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route De Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Claudia Dominguez-CurellDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route De Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
David CommuniInstitut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Biologie Humaine Et Moléculaire, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Fabio S TacconeDepartment of Intensive Care, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route De Lennik 808, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute brain injuries are associated with high mortality rates and poor long-term functional outcomes. Measurement of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers in patients with acute brain injuries may help elucidate some of the pathophysiological pathways involved in the prognosis of these patients.

methodsWe performed a systematic search and descriptive review using the MEDLINE database and the PubMed interface from inception up to June 29, 2021, to retrieve observational studies in which the relationship between CSF concentrations of protein biomarkers and neurological outcomes was reported in patients with acute brain injury [traumatic brain injury, subarachnoid hemorrhage, acute ischemic stroke, status epilepticus or post-cardiac arrest]. We classified the studies according to whether or not biomarker concentrations were associated with neurological outcomes. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale.

resultsOf the 39 studies that met our criteria, 30 reported that the biomarker concentration was associated with neurological outcome and 9 reported no association. In TBI, increased extracellular concentrations of biomarkers related to neuronal cytoskeletal disruption, apoptosis and inflammation were associated with the severity of acute brain injury, early mortality and worse long-term functional outcome. Reduced concentrations of protein biomarkers related to impaired redox function were associated with increased risk of neurological deficit. In non-traumatic acute brain injury, concentrations of CSF protein biomarkers related to dysregulated inflammation and apoptosis were associated with a greater risk of vasospasm and a larger volume of brain ischemia. There was a high risk of bias across the studies.

conclusionIn patients with acute brain injury, altered CSF concentrations of protein biomarkers related to cytoskeletal damage, inflammation, apoptosis and oxidative stress may be predictive of worse neurological outcomes.

Indexed as

Cerebrospinal FluidAdultBiomarkersBrain InjuriesHumansPrognosisProteinsBiomarkersProteinsCerebrospinal fluidNeurological outcomesSubarachnoid hemorrhageTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID34353354
PMCPMC8340466
OpenAlexW3190186455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.