Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34353339›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2021

Dexamethasone and tocilizumab treatment considerably reduces the value of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin to detect secondary bacterial infections in COVID-19 patients.

Emma J Kooistra, Miranda van Berkel, Noortje F van Kempen, Celine R M van Latum, Niklas Bruse, Tim Frenzel, Maarten J W van den Berg, Jeroen A Schouten, Matthijs Kox, Peter Pickkers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emma J Kooistra *Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5359-4840
Miranda van Berkel *Department of Laboratory Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6500-3419
Noortje F van KempenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8574-2043
Celine R M van LatumDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1503-0988
Niklas BruseDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5146-5295
Tim FrenzelDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3988-7131
Maarten J W van den BergDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1943-1703
Jeroen A SchoutenDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9118-4420
Matthijs KoxDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6537-6971
Peter PickkersDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. peter.pickkers@radboudumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-1104-4303
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProcalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were previously shown to have value for the detection of secondary infections in critically ill COVID-19 patients. However, since the introduction of immunomodulatory therapy, the value of these biomarkers is unclear. We investigated PCT and CRP kinetics in critically ill COVID-19 patients treated with dexamethasone with or without tocilizumab, and assessed the value of these biomarkers to detect secondary bacterial infections.

methodsIn this prospective study, 190 critically ill COVID-19 patients were divided into three treatment groups: no dexamethasone, no tocilizumab (D-T-), dexamethasone, no tocilizumab (D+T-), and dexamethasone and tocilizumab (D+T+). Serial data of PCT and CRP were aligned on the last day of dexamethasone treatment, and kinetics of these biomarkers were analyzed between 6 days prior to cessation of dexamethasone and 10 days afterwards. Furthermore, the D+T- and D+T+ groups were subdivided into secondary infection and no-secondary infection groups to analyze differences in PCT and CRP kinetics and calculate detection accuracy of these biomarkers for the occurrence of a secondary infection.

resultsFollowing cessation of dexamethasone, there was a rebound in PCT and CRP levels, most pronounced in the D+T- group. Upon occurrence of a secondary infection, no significant increase in PCT and CRP levels was observed in the D+T- group (p = 0.052 and p = 0.08, respectively). Although PCT levels increased significantly in patients of the D+T+ group who developed a secondary infection (p = 0.0003), this rise was only apparent from day 2 post-infection onwards. CRP levels remained suppressed in the D+T+ group. Receiver operating curve analysis of PCT and CRP levels yielded area under the curves of 0.52 and 0.55, respectively, which are both markedly lower than those found in the group of COVID-19 patients not treated with immunomodulatory drugs (0.80 and 0.76, respectively, with p values for differences between groups of 0.001 and 0.02, respectively).

conclusionsCessation of dexamethasone in critically ill COVID-19 patients results in a rebound increase in PCT and CRP levels unrelated to the occurrence of secondary bacterial infections. Furthermore, immunomodulatory treatment with dexamethasone and tocilizumab considerably reduces the value of PCT and CRP for detection of secondary infections in COVID-19 patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBacterial InfectionsCoinfectionCOVID-19C-Reactive ProteinCritical IllnessDexamethasoneFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsProcalcitoninProspective StudiesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedC-Reactive ProteinDexamethasoneProcalcitonintocilizumabCOVID-19c-reactive proteinDexamethasonePredictionProcalcitoninTocilizumab

Identifiers

PMID34353339
PMCPMC8340482
OpenAlexW3190672235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.