ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2021
Prevalence of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) in the United States: estimate from three treatment centers and a patient organization.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding the clinical morbidity and mortality of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a systematic literature review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Pharmacokinetics of Zilurgisertib With and Without Food from Single and Multiple Ascending Dose Phase 1 Studies in Healthy Adults.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2025Trial
- Characterization of flare-ups and impact of garetosmab in adults with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a post hoc analysis of the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled LUMINA-1 trial.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024Trial
- Garetosmab in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial.Nature medicine · 2023Trial
- Measures of mortality among people living with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva in the United States, 2017-2023.JBMR plus · 2026Article
- The socioeconomic impacts of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: evidence from a retrospective case-control study in France.JBMR plus · 2026Article
- Precision RNAi for Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva: a combinatorial, unimolecular, allele selective approach.Research square · 2026Article
- Knowledge, skills, and attitudinal gaps in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva diagnosis and management in the United States.JBMR plus · 2026Article
- USP24-dependent STAT2 stabilization mediates physiologic and pathologic bone formation.Cell death & disease · 2026Article
- Effects of Renal and Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics of Zilurgisertib.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Content Validation of the Flares Diary: A Qualitative Analysis of the Flares Experience Within the Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) Population.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Article
- Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: genetic and clinical characterization in a cohort of Polish patients and review of potential therapies.Journal of applied genetics · 2026Review
- Assessing rare disease understanding: a novel disease readiness level framework.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
- Compound KTI-2338 Inhibits ACVR1 Receptor Signaling in Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Intermittent and Short-Term Empirical Ruxolitinib Regimen for Steroid-Refractory Flareups of Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2025Article
- Ectopic pseudojoints in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva.JBMR plus · 2025Article
- All Restricted Spines are not Spondyloarthritis: Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva (FOP) in Monozygotic Twins presenting to Rheumatology Clinic.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2025Article
- Review
- Identifying global trends from case reports of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a scoping review.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP), an ultra-rare, progressive, and permanently disabling disorder of extraskeletal ossification, is characterized by episodic and painful flare-ups and irreversible heterotopic ossification in muscles, tendons, and ligaments. Prevalence estimates have been hindered by the rarity of FOP and the heterogeneity of disease presentation. This study aimed to provide a baseline prevalence of FOP in the United States, based on contact with one of 3 leading treatment centers for FOP (University of Pennsylvania, Mayo Clinic, or University of California San Francisco), the International Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Association (IFOPA) membership list, or the IFOPA FOP Registry through July 22, 2020.
resultsPatient records were reviewed, collected, and deduplicated using first and last name initials, sex, state, and year of birth. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve was applied to each individual patient to estimate the probability that he or she was still alive, and a probability-weighted net prevalence estimate was calculated. After deduplication, 373 unique patients were identified in the United States, 294 of whom who were not listed as deceased in any list. The average time since last contact for 284 patients was 1.5 years. Based on the application of the survival probability, it is estimated that 279 of these patients were alive on the prevalence date (22 July 2020). An adjusted prevalence of 0.88 per million US residents was calculated using either an average survival rate estimate of 98.4% or a conservative survival rate estimate of 92.3% (based on the Kaplan-Meier survival curve from a previous study) and the US Census 2020 estimate of 329,992,681 on prevalence day.
conclusionsThis study suggests that the prevalence of FOP is higher than the often-cited value of 0.5 per million. Even so, because inclusion in this study was contingent upon treatment by the authors, IFOPA membership with confirmed clinical diagnosis, and the FOP Registry, the prevalence of FOP in the US may be higher than that identified here. Thus, it is imperative that efforts be made to identify and provide expert care for patients with this ultra-rare, significantly debilitating disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.