Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34353327›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2021

Prevalence of fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) in the United States: estimate from three treatment centers and a patient organization.

Robert J Pignolo, Edward C Hsiao, Genevieve Baujat, David Lapidus, Adam Sherman, Frederick S Kaplan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Robert J PignoloGeriatric Medicine & Gerontology, Robert and Arlene Kogod Professor of Geriatric Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8533-9438
Edward C HsiaoRobert L. Kroc Chair in Rheumatic and Connective Tissue Diseases III, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Genevieve BaujatDepartment of Clinical Genetics, INSERM U1163, Paris-Descartes University, Imagine Institute, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Paris, France.
David LapidusLapidusData Inc., Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Adam ShermanThe International FOP Association, North Kansas City, MO, USA.
Frederick S KaplanDepartments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Medicine, The Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Frederick.Kaplan@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Inserm · FRMayo Clinic in Arizona · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Pharmacologic modulation of innate immune dysfunction in heterotopic ossificationR01AR073015 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HSIAO, EDWARD C · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR073015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP), an ultra-rare, progressive, and permanently disabling disorder of extraskeletal ossification, is characterized by episodic and painful flare-ups and irreversible heterotopic ossification in muscles, tendons, and ligaments. Prevalence estimates have been hindered by the rarity of FOP and the heterogeneity of disease presentation. This study aimed to provide a baseline prevalence of FOP in the United States, based on contact with one of 3 leading treatment centers for FOP (University of Pennsylvania, Mayo Clinic, or University of California San Francisco), the International Fibrodysplasia Ossificans Progressiva Association (IFOPA) membership list, or the IFOPA FOP Registry through July 22, 2020.

resultsPatient records were reviewed, collected, and deduplicated using first and last name initials, sex, state, and year of birth. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve was applied to each individual patient to estimate the probability that he or she was still alive, and a probability-weighted net prevalence estimate was calculated. After deduplication, 373 unique patients were identified in the United States, 294 of whom who were not listed as deceased in any list. The average time since last contact for 284 patients was 1.5 years. Based on the application of the survival probability, it is estimated that 279 of these patients were alive on the prevalence date (22 July 2020). An adjusted prevalence of 0.88 per million US residents was calculated using either an average survival rate estimate of 98.4% or a conservative survival rate estimate of 92.3% (based on the Kaplan-Meier survival curve from a previous study) and the US Census 2020 estimate of 329,992,681 on prevalence day.

conclusionsThis study suggests that the prevalence of FOP is higher than the often-cited value of 0.5 per million. Even so, because inclusion in this study was contingent upon treatment by the authors, IFOPA membership with confirmed clinical diagnosis, and the FOP Registry, the prevalence of FOP in the US may be higher than that identified here. Thus, it is imperative that efforts be made to identify and provide expert care for patients with this ultra-rare, significantly debilitating disease.

Indexed as

Myositis OssificansOssification, HeterotopicFemaleHumansPrevalenceRegistriesUnited StatesACVR1EpidemiologyFibrodysplasia ossificans progressivaFOPHeterotopic ossificationPrevalenceRare disease

Identifiers

PMID34353327
PMCPMC8340531
OpenAlexW3189980870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.