ArticleBMC women's health2021
Bayesian semi-parametric spatial modelling of intimate partner violence in Namibia using 2013 Demographic Health Survey Data.
Article in BMC women's health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spatial distribution of intimate partner violence in Jordan: results from the 2023 Population and Family Health Survey.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Spatial mapping and determinants of intimate partner violence among married women in Sierra Leone: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2025Article
- The spatial distribution of intimate partner violence prevalence and its associated factors among women aged 15-49 years in Zambia: evidence from the 2018 Demographic and Health Survey.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Factors Associated With Domestic Violence Against Women at Different Stages of Life: Findings From a 19-Year Longitudinal Dataset From the MINIMat Trial in Rural Bangladesh (2001-2020).Journal of interpersonal violence · 2023Article
- Bayesian spatial modelling of intimate partner violence and associated factors among adult women and men: evidence from 2019/2020 Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Determinants of Emotional Intimate Partner Violence against Women and Girls with Children in Mexican Households: An Ecological Framework.Journal of interpersonal violence · 2022Article
- Still Standing Inside: A Local Idiom Related to Trauma among Namibian Speakers of Khoekhoegowab.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntimate partner violence (IPV) is an important public health problem with health and socioeconomic consequences and is endemic in Namibia. Studies assessing risk factors for IPV often use logistic and Poisson regression without geographical location information and spatial effects. We used a Bayesian spatial semi-parametric regression model to determine the risk factors for IPV in Namibia; assess the non-linear effects of age difference between partners and determine spatial effects in the different regions on IPV prevalence.
methodsWe used the couples' dataset of the 2013-2014 Namibia Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) obtained on request from Measure DHS. The DHS domestic violence module included 2226 women. We generated a binary variable measuring IPV from the questions "ever experienced physical, sexual or emotional violence?" Covariates included respondent's educational level, age, couples' age difference, place of residence and partner's educational level. All estimation was done with the full Bayesian approach using R version 3.5.2 implementing the R2BayesX package.
resultsIPV country prevalence was 33.3% (95% CI = 30.1-36.5%); Kavango had the highest [50.6% (95% CI = 41.2-60.1%)] and Oshana the lowest [11.5% (95% CI = 3.2-19.9%)] regional prevalence. IPV prevalence was highest among teenagers [60.8% (95% CI = 36.9-84.7%)]). The spatial semi-parametric model used for adjusted results controlled for regional spatial effects, respondent's age, age difference, respondent's years of education, residence, wealth, and education levels. Women with higher education were 50% less likely to experience IPV [aOR: 0.46, 95% CI = 0.23-0.87]. For non-linear effects, the risk of IPV was high for women ≥ 5 years older or ≥ 25 years younger than their partners. Younger and older women had higher risks of IPV than those between 25 and 45 years. For spatial variation of IPV prevalence, northern regions had low spatial effects while western regions had very high spatial effects.
conclusionThe prevalence of IPV among Namibia women was high especially among teenagers, with higher educational levels being protective. The risk of IPV was lower in rural than urban areas and higher with wide partner age differences. Interventions and policies for IPV prevention in Namibia are needed for couples with wide age differences as well as for younger women, women with lower educational attainment and in urban and western regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.