Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34353313›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2021

Differential effects of HIF2α antagonist and HIF2α silencing in renal cancer and sensitivity to repurposed drugs.

Esther Arnaiz, Ana Miar, Esther Bridges, Naveen Prasad, Stephanie B Hatch, Daniel Ebner, Charles H Lawrie, Adrian L Harris

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Esther ArnaizDepartment of Medical Oncology, Molecular Oncology Laboratories, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DS, UK.
Ana MiarDepartment of Oncology, Old Road Campus Research Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK. anbelen_mc@hotmail.com.
Esther BridgesDepartment of Medical Oncology, Molecular Oncology Laboratories, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DS, UK.
Naveen PrasadDepartment of Oncology, Old Road Campus Research Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK.
Stephanie B HatchNuffield Department of Medicine, NDM Research Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK.
Daniel EbnerNuffield Department of Medicine, NDM Research Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK.
Charles H Lawrie *Department of Oncology, Molecular Oncology Group, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Paseo Doctor Begiristain s/n, 20014, San-Sebastián, Spain.
Adrian L Harris *Department of Medical Oncology, Molecular Oncology Laboratories, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DS, UK.
University of Oxford · GBBiogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ESJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 18974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn clear cell renal cell carcinoma, 80% of cases have biallelic inactivation of the VHL gene, leading to constitutive activation of both HIF1α and HIF2α. As HIF2α is the driver of the disease promoting tumour growth and metastasis, drugs targeting HIF2α have been developed. However, resistance is common, therefore new therapies are needed.

methodsWe assessed the effect of the HIF2α antagonist PT2385 in several steps of tumour development and performed RNAseq to identify genes differentially expressed upon treatment. A drug screening was used to identify drugs with antiproliferative effects on VHL-mutated HIF2α-expressing cells and could increase effectiveness of PT2385.

resultsPT2385 did not reduce cell proliferation or clonogenicity but, in contrast to the genetic silencing of HIF2α, it reduced in vitro cell invasion. Many HIF-inducible genes were down-regulated upon PT2385 treatment, whereas some genes involved in cell migration or extracellular matrix were up-regulated. HIF2α was associated with resistance to statins, addition to PT2385 did not increase the sensitivity.

conclusionsthis study shows key differences between inhibiting a target versus knockdown, which are potentially targetable.

Indexed as

Gene SilencingAntineoplastic AgentsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationDrug RepositioningDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEndothelial PAS Domain-Containing Protein 1Epithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionGene Expression ProfilingHumansIndansKidney NeoplasmsSulfonesTranscriptional ActivationAntineoplastic AgentsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsEndothelial PAS Domain-Containing Protein 1IndansPT2385SulfonesDrug resistanceEMTHIF2αRenal cancer

Identifiers

PMID34353313
PMCPMC8344147
OpenAlexW3131279730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.