Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34353295›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2021

Pregnant women utilization of dental services: still a challenge in low resource setting.

Chidozie Onwuka, Chidinma Ifechi Onwuka, Emeka Ifeanyi Iloghalu, Peter Chukwudi Udealor, Euzebus Chinonye Ezugwu, Ifeanyi Emmanuel Menuba, Emmanuel Onyebuchi Ugwu, Chinyere Ututu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Prevalence and factors associated with the presence of oral infections in pregnant women in a medium-sized municipality in Brazil.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chidozie OnwukaOral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery Department, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Chidinma Ifechi OnwukaObstetrics and Gynaecology Department, University of Nigeria Nsukka/University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria. cifechi@yahoo.com.
Emeka Ifeanyi IloghaluObstetrics and Gynaecology Department, University of Nigeria Nsukka/University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria.
Peter Chukwudi UdealorObstetrics and Gynaecology Department, University of Nigeria Nsukka/University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria.
Euzebus Chinonye EzugwuObstetrics and Gynaecology Department, University of Nigeria Nsukka/University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria.
Ifeanyi Emmanuel MenubaObstetrics and Gynaecology Department, University of Nigeria Nsukka/University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria.
Emmanuel Onyebuchi UgwuObstetrics and Gynaecology Department, University of Nigeria Nsukka/University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria.
Chinyere UtutuDepartment of Child Dental Health, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Rivers State, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoor oral health in pregnancy can be associated with poor pregnancy outcome, however, dental consultation among pregnant women appears to be low.

methodsThis was a questionnaire-based study of 413 women who attended the antenatal clinic of University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH), Ituku/Ozalla, Enugu. The information obtained was analyzed using SPSS version 22. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsOnly 36 (8.7%) of the respondents had dental consultations in index pregnancy for complaints such as tooth ache and decay (66.7%) and pain as well as swelling of the gum (33.3%). The most common reason given for not visiting a dentist during the index pregnancy was the visit not being relevant to their pregnancy outcome (69.2%). After counseling them, only 249 (60.3%) agreed to have dental consultation during subsequent pregnancies. The relationship between visiting the dentist and place of residence (< 0.001), occupation (0.019) and frequency of brushing/ changing of brush (0.005, < 0.001 respectively) were statistically significant.

conclusionThe prevalence of dental consultation during pregnancy is very low. Pregnant women should be encouraged to have routine dental consultation with oral health counseling and check-up incorporated as part of routine antenatal care.

Indexed as

Pregnant PeoplePrenatal CareCross-Sectional StudiesDental CareFemaleHumansNigeriaPregnancyDental consultationEnuguPredictorsPregnancyWomen

Identifiers

PMID34353295
PMCPMC8340410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.