Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34352699›Full record

ReviewColloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces2021

Conventional and microfluidic methods for airborne virus isolation and detection.

Sophie Krokhine, Hadis Torabi, Ali Doostmohammadi, Pouya Rezai

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Concentrating viable airborne pathogens using a virtual impactor with a compact water-based condensation air sampler.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sophie KrokhineFaculty of Science, McMaster University, Burke Science Building, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada. Electronic address: s.n.krokhine@gmail.com.
Hadis TorabiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Isfahan, Iran. Electronic address: hadis.torabi@yahoo.com.
Ali DoostmohammadiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, York University, ON, Canada. Electronic address: doost@yorku.ca.
Pouya RezaiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, York University, ON, Canada. Electronic address: prezai@yorku.ca.
York University · CAMcMaster University · CAUniversity of Isfahan · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the COVID-19 pandemic, the threat of infectious diseases to public health and safety has become much more apparent. Viral, bacterial and fungal diseases have led to the loss of millions of lives, especially in the developing world. Diseases caused by airborne viruses like SARS-CoV-2 are difficult to control, as these viruses are easily transmissible and can circulate in the air for hours. To contain outbreaks of viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 and institute targeted precautions, it is important to detect them in air and understand how they infect their targets. Point-of-care (PoC) diagnostics and point-of-need (PoN) detection methods are necessary to rapidly test patient and environmental samples, so precautions can immediately be applied. Traditional benchtop detection methods such as ELISA, PCR and culture are not suitable for PoC and PoN monitoring, because they can take hours to days and require specialized equipment. Microfluidic devices can be made at low cost to perform such assays rapidly and at the PoN. They can also be integrated with air- and liquid-based sampling technologies to capture and analyze viruses from air and body fluids. Here, conventional and microfluidic virus detection methods are reviewed and compared. The use of air sampling devices to capture and concentrate viruses is discussed first, followed by a review of analysis methods such as immunoassays, RT-PCR and isothermal amplification in conventional and microfluidic platforms. This review provides an overview of the capabilities of microfluidics in virus handling and detection, which will be useful to infectious disease researchers, biomedical engineers, and public health agencies.

Indexed as

Air MicrobiologyMicrofluidicsCOVID-19HumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2VirusesAirborne transmissionMicrofluidicsPoint-of-needVirusVirus collectionVirus detection

Identifiers

PMID34352699
PMCPMC8249716
OpenAlexW3179736094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.