Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34352559›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatric research2021

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on involuntary and urgent inpatient admissions for psychiatric disorders in a German-wide hospital network.

Jonathan Mathias Fasshauer, Andreas Bollmann, Sven Hohenstein, Konstantinos Mouratis, Gerhard Hindricks, Andreas Meier-Hellmann, Ralf Kuhlen, Andreas Broocks, Georg Schomerus, Katarina Stengler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatric research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Utilization of mental health services during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic - a systematic review and meta-analysis.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The impact of COVID-19 on the mental health workforce: A rapid review.International journal of mental health nursing · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan Mathias FasshauerDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Helios Park Hospital Leipzig, Germany; Department of Psychiatry, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Andreas BollmannHeart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.
Sven HohensteinHeart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.
Konstantinos MouratisHeart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.
Gerhard HindricksHeart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.
Andreas Meier-HellmannHelios Hospitals, Berlin, Germany.
Ralf KuhlenHelios Health, Berlin, Germany.
Andreas BroocksDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Carl-Friedrich-Flemming-Klinik Schwerin, Germany.
Georg SchomerusDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Katarina StenglerDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Helios Park Hospital Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: katarina.stengler@helios-gesundheit.de.
Leipzig Heart Institute · DEHelios Hospital Berlin-Buch · DEHelios Park-Klinikum Leipzig · DEHelios Hospital Schwerin · DELeipzig University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The impact of COVID-19 on urgent and involuntary inpatient admissions, as well as coercive measures, has not been assessed so far. A retrospective study was performed analyzing claims data for inpatient psychiatric admissions between 2018 and 2020 (total n = 64,502) from a large German Hospital network. Whilst the total number of urgent admissions decreased in 2020 (12,383) as compared to 2019 (13,493) and 2018 (13,469), a significant increase in the percentage of urgent admissions was observed in 2020 (62.9%) as compared to 2019 (60.6%) and 2018 (59.7%). Compared to this study period, Odds ratio (OR) for proportion were 0.87 (0.84, 0.91) and 0.91 (0.87, 0.95) for 2018 and 2019, respectively (both p < 0.00001). Percentage of involuntary psychiatric admissions also significantly increased in 2020 and OR compared to this study period ranged from 0.86 (0.81, 0.93) in 2019 (p < 0.0001) to 0.88 (0.82, 0.95) in 2018 (p < 0.001). Proportion of coercive measures significantly increased in 2020 as compared to 2019 (p = 0.004). Taken together, the present study shows an increase in the proportion of involuntary and urgent psychiatric admissions during the whole pandemic year 2020 as compared to 2018 and 2019. The long-term impact of these COVID-19 pandemic-related trends on psychiatric health care needs to be assessed in further studies.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental DisordersHospitalsHumansInpatientsPandemicsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Coercive measuresCOVID-19Inpatient admissionsInvoluntary admissionsPsychiatric disordersUrgent admissions

Identifiers

PMID34352559
PMCPMC8417753
OpenAlexW3192382059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.