Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34352289›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2021

Practice Patterns of Pediatric Total Body Irradiation Techniques: A Children's Oncology Group Survey.

Prema Rassiah, Natia Esiashvili, Arthur J Olch, Chia-Ho Hua, Ken Ulin, Andrea Molineu, Karen Marcus, Mahesh Gopalakrishnan, Susha Pillai, Nataliya Kovalchuk and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Spinning Manny Indexed Overlay System for VMAT total body irradiation.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Validation of Acuros for total body irradiation at extended distance.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Prema RassiahDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. Electronic address: prema.rassiah@hci.utah.edu.
Natia EsiashviliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Arthur J OlchDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California and Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Chia-Ho HuaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Ken UlinImaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Rhode Island QA Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Lincoln, Rhode Island.
Andrea MolineuImaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Houston QA Center, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Karen MarcusDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mahesh GopalakrishnanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Susha PillaiDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Nataliya KovalchukDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
An LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope, Los Angeles, California.
Greg NiyazovDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jose PeñagarícanoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida. Electronic address: Jose.Penagaricano@Moffitt.org.
Fred CheungMedical Physics division, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Adam C OlsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Cheng-Chia WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York.
Harish K MalhotraDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York.
Iain J MacEwanDepartment of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Jacqueline FaughtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
John C BrenemanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
David S FollowillImaging and Radiation Oncology Core, Houston QA Center, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Thomas J FitzGeraldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, Massachusetts.
John A KalapurakalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

NCTN BIQSFP ANBL1531 (NRT)U10CA180886 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI Douglas S. Hawkins · 2014 to 2026
$390.6M
IROC: Enhancing local enrolling site radiological data capture capabilities for NCTN trialsU24CA180803 · NCI · AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY · PI Thomas J. FitzGerald, MICHAEL V KNOPP · 2014 to 2026
$116.2M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180886NCI NIH HHS U24 CA180803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to examine current practice patterns in pediatric total body irradiation (TBI) techniques among COG member institutions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between November 2019 and February 2020, a questionnaire containing 52 questions related to the technical aspects of TBI was sent to medical physicists at 152 COG institutions. The questions were designed to obtain technical information on commonly used TBI treatment techniques. Another set of 9 questions related to the clinical management of patients undergoing TBI was sent to 152 COG member radiation oncologists at the same institutions.

resultsTwelve institutions were excluded because TBI was not performed in their institutions. A total of 88 physicists from 88 institutions (63% response rate) and 96 radiation oncologists from 96 institutions (69% response rate) responded. The anterior-posterior/posterior-anterior (AP/PA) technique was the most common technique reported (49 institutions [56%]); 44 institutions (50%) used the lateral technique, and 14 (16%) used volumetric modulated arc therapy or tomotherapy. Midplane dose rates of 6 to 15 cGy/min were most commonly used. The most common specification for lung dose was the midlung dose for both AP/PA techniques (71%) and lateral techniques (63%). Almost all physician responders agreed with the need to refine current TBI techniques, and 79% supported the investigation of new TBI techniques to further lower the lung dose.

conclusionsThere was no consistency in the practice patterns, methods for dose measurement, and reporting of TBI doses among COG institutions. The lack of standardization precludes meaningful correlation between TBI doses and clinical outcomes including disease control and normal tissue toxicity. The COG radiation oncology discipline is currently undertaking several steps to standardize the practice and dose reporting of pediatric TBI using detailed questionnaires and phantom-based credentialing for all COG centers.

Indexed as

Radiation OncologyRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedChildHumansLungSurveys and QuestionnairesWhole-Body Irradiation

Identifiers

PMID34352289
PMCPMC11977860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.