ArticleJournal of clinical psychology2021
A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 publications in the ten psychology-related Web of Science categories in the social science citation index.
Article in Journal of clinical psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- A bibliometric analysis of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (2005-2024): mapping the knowledge landscape and future trends.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Some comments on using of Web of Science Core Collection for bibliometric studies in volume 29 of theWorld journal of methodology · 2025Article
- A bibliometric analysis of the relationship between traumatic brain injury and Alzheimer's disease (1993-2023).Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Article
- Analyzing the bibliometrics of brain-gut axis and Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- A bibliometric analysis of Prader-Willi syndrome from 2002 to 2022.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2024Article
- Postural deformities in Parkinson's disease: A bibliometric analysis based on web of science.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Olfactory and Gustatory Dysfunction in COVID-19: A Global Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis.The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology · 2023Article
- COVID research across the social sciences in 2020: a bibliometric approach.Scientometrics · 2023Article
- Economic expectations and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic: a one-year longitudinal evaluation on Italian university students.Quality & quantity · 2023Article
- Social Network Analysis of COVID-19 Research and the Changing International Collaboration Structure.Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (science) · 2022Article
- E-learning in higher education institutions during COVID-19 pandemic: current and future trends through bibliometric analysis.Heliyon · 2022Review
- Current Trends and Research Hotspots in Pancreatic Stellate Cells: A Bibliometric Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 publications in the ten psychology-related Web of Science categories in the social science citation index.Journal of clinical psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics of the COVID-19 publications in the ten psychology-related Web of Science categories in the social science citation index 10-month following the COVID-19 outbreak.
methodsSix publication indicators were examined across authors, institutions, and countries.
resultsAnalyses showed that the United States has produced the highest number of empirical investigations into the psychological impact of COVID-19, and the majority of the research across all countries was in clinical and psychopathology. Distribution of journals and psychology-related Web of Science categories were analyzed. Frequently used words in article title, author keywords, and KeyWords Plus were also presented.
conclusionsThe findings suggest that there are substantial clinical implications associated with COVID-19. There are recommendations offered for future research and clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.