Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34352009›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Project Inclusive Genetics: Exploring the impact of patient-centered counseling training on physical disability bias in the prenatal setting.

Emma Vaimberg, Lindsay Demers, Eric Ford, Maya Sabatello, Blair Stevens, Shoumita Dasgupta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Implicit Bias in Health Professionals: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Unconscious Bias among Health Professionals: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Emma VaimbergDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0890-0041
Lindsay DemersDepartment of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Eric FordIndependent Scholar, Brooklyn, NY, United States of America.
Maya SabatelloDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Blair StevensDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, TX, United States of America.
Shoumita DasguptaDepartment of Medicine, Biomedical Genetics Section, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Boston University · USCal Humanities · USFilm Independent · USJohns Hopkins Hospital · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

Disability, diversity and trust in precision medicine research: stakeholdersengagementR01HG010868 · NHGRI · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI SABATELLO, MAYA · 2020 to 2023
$3.5M
Impact of Psychiatric Genetic Data on Civil Litigation and its Relationship with StigmaK01HG008653 · NHGRI · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI SABATELLO, MAYA · 2015 to 2019
$871k
NHGRI NIH HHS K01 HG008653NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010868
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is robust research examining the negative impact of racial and socioeconomic implicit bias on healthcare provider clinical decision-making. However, other under-studied important biases are likely to impact clinical care as well. The goal of this study was to explore the presence of bias against people with physical disability among a heterogeneous group of healthcare workers and trainees and to evaluate the effect of implicit association testing and an educational module on this bias.

methodThe study was composed of a one-hour web-based survey and educational module. The survey included an explicit disability bias assessment, disability Implicit Association Tests (IATs), demographic collection, and pre- and post- module clinical vignettes of prenatal patient scenarios. In addition to providing counseling to hypothetical patients, participants also indicated their personal preferences on genetic testing and termination. The educational module focused on the principles of patient-centered counseling.

resultsThe collected data reflects responses from 335 participants. Within this sample, there were both explicit and implicit biases towards individuals with physical disabilities. Prior to the IAT and educational module, when respondents were tasked with providing genetic testing recommendations, implicit biases and personal preferences for genetic testing and termination influenced respondents' clinical recommendations. Importantly, having previous professional experience with individuals with disabilities diminished biased clinical recommendations prior to the intervention. In response to the IAT and educational intervention, the effect of implicit bias and personal preferences on clinical recommendations decreased.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates how bias against a marginalized group exists within the medical community and that personal opinions can impact clinical counseling. Importantly, our findings suggest that there are strategies that can be easily implemented into curricula to address disability bias, including formal educational interventions and the addition of professional experiences into healthcare professional training programs.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultBiasClinical Decision-MakingFemaleGenetic CounselingHealth PersonnelHumansMaleNoninvasive Prenatal TestingPatient-Centered CarePersons with DisabilitiesPrejudice

Identifiers

PMID34352009
PMCPMC8341652
OpenAlexW3188072436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.