ArticlePloS one2021
Optimal distribution-preserving downsampling of large biomedical data sets (opdisDownsampling).
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Blocking Interleukin-17 Antibodies in Tumor Immunotherapy with Checkpoint Inhibitors or Tumor-Specific T Cells in Implanted and UVB-Induced Cancers.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- A model-agnostic framework for dataset-specific selection of missing value imputation methods in pain-related numerical data.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2026Article
- 20D-Dynamic Representation of Protein Sequences Combined with K-means Clustering.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2026Article
- Non-variable RNA deletion using the CRISPR-Cas9 technique demonstrated improved outcomes in human intestine single-cell RNA sequencing data, even at half sequencing depths.Genomics & informatics · 2025Article
- Augmenting small biomedical datasets using generative AI methods based on self-organizing neural networks.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- FlowAtlas: an interactive tool for high-dimensional immunophenotyping analysis bridging FlowJo with computational tools in Julia.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Article
- Machine learning analysis predicts a person's sex based on mechanical but not thermal pain thresholds.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationThe size of today's biomedical data sets pushes computer equipment to its limits, even for seemingly standard analysis tasks such as data projection or clustering. Reducing large biomedical data by downsampling is therefore a common early step in data processing, often performed as random uniform class-proportional downsampling. In this report, we hypothesized that this can be optimized to obtain samples that better reflect the entire data set than those obtained using the current standard method.
resultsBy repeating the random sampling and comparing the distribution of the drawn sample with the distribution of the original data, it was possible to establish a method for obtaining subsets of data that better reflect the entire data set than taking only the first randomly selected subsample, as is the current standard. Experiments on artificial and real biomedical data sets showed that the reconstruction of the remaining data from the original data set from the downsampled data improved significantly. This was observed with both principal component analysis and autoencoding neural networks. The fidelity was dependent on both the number of cases drawn from the original and the number of samples drawn.
conclusionsOptimal distribution-preserving class-proportional downsampling yields data subsets that reflect the structure of the entire data better than those obtained with the standard method. By using distributional similarity as the only selection criterion, the proposed method does not in any way affect the results of a later planned analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.