Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34351997›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Perceptions, awareness on snakebite envenoming among the tribal community and health care providers of Dahanu block, Palghar District in Maharashtra, India.

Itta Krishna Chaaithanya, Dipak Abnave, Himmatrao Bawaskar, Ujwal Pachalkar, Sandip Tarukar, Neha Salvi, Prabhakar Bhoye, Arun Yadav, Smita D Mahale, Rahul K Gajbhiye

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Examining the Role of Treatment-seeking Behavior in Snakebite Mortality: A Narrative Review.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Itta Krishna ChaaithanyaModel Rural Health Research Unit, Department of Health Research, Government of India, Dahanu, Maharashtra, India.
Dipak AbnaveModel Rural Health Research Unit, Department of Health Research, Government of India, Dahanu, Maharashtra, India.
Himmatrao BawaskarBawaskar Hospital and Clinical Research Center, Mahad, Raigad, Maharashtra, India.
Ujwal PachalkarModel Rural Health Research Unit, Department of Health Research, Government of India, Dahanu, Maharashtra, India.
Sandip TarukarModel Rural Health Research Unit, Department of Health Research, Government of India, Dahanu, Maharashtra, India.
Neha SalviModel Rural Health Research Unit, Department of Health Research, Government of India, Dahanu, Maharashtra, India.
Prabhakar BhoyeSub District Hospital, Dahanu, Maharashtra, India.
Arun YadavSub District Hospital, Dahanu, Maharashtra, India.
Smita D MahaleModel Rural Health Research Unit, Department of Health Research, Government of India, Dahanu, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4164-7455
Rahul K GajbhiyeModel Rural Health Research Unit, Department of Health Research, Government of India, Dahanu, Maharashtra, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3864-1818
Government of Maharashtra · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIndia has remarkably the highest number of snakebite cases contributing to nearly 50% of the global snakebite deaths. Despite this fact, there is limited knowledge and awareness regarding the management practices for snakebite in the Indian population. The study aimed to explore the knowledge, awareness, and perception of snakes and snakebites, first aid, and treatment amongst the community and the frontline health workers in a tribal block of Dahanu, Maharashtra, India.

methodsA cross-sectional study was carried out from June 2016 to October 2018 in the Dahanu Block, Maharashtra. Perceptions, knowledge, awareness, and first-aid practices on the snakebites among the community were studied through focus group discussions (FGDs). Semi-structured questionnaires were used to assess the knowledge, awareness, and experience of the traditional faith healers, snake rescuers, frontline health workers on the snakebites and their management. A facility check survey was conducted using pre-tested questionnaires for different levels of the government health care facilities.

resultsMost of the tribal community was aware of the commonly found snakes and their hiding places. However, there was inadequate knowledge on the identification and classification of venomous snakes. Belief in a snake god, the perception that snakes will not come out during thunderstorms, change in taste sensation, the ability of tamarind seeds or magnet to reduce the venom effect were some of the superstitions reported by the tribal community. The application of a harmful method (Tourniquet) as the first aid for snakebite was practiced by the tribal community. They preferred herbal medicines and visiting the traditional faith healers before shifting the patient to the government health facility. The knowledge on the ability to identify venomous snakebites and anti-venom was significantly higher amongst nurses and accredited social health activists (ASHAs) than auxiliary nurse midwives (ANMs) and multi-purpose workers (MPWs) (p < 0.05). None of the traditional faith healers; but nearly 60% of snake rescuers were aware of anti-venom. Fifty percent of the medical officers in Dahanu block did not have correct knowledge about the Krait bite symptoms, and renal complications due to the Russell viper bite.

conclusionsInappropriate perception, inadequate awareness, and knowledge about snakes and snakebites may predispose the tribal community to increased risks of venomous snakebites. Unproven and harmful methods for snakebite treatment practiced by the community and traditional faith healers could be dangerous leading to high mortality. Therefore, a multi-sectoral approach of community awareness, mapping of vulnerable populations, capacity building of health care facility, empowerment of health care workers (HCWs) could be useful for reducing the mortality and morbidity due to snakebite envenoming in India.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultFemaleFirst AidHealth PersonnelHumansIndiaMaleMedicine, TraditionalRural PopulationSnake Bites

Identifiers

PMID34351997
PMCPMC8341635
OpenAlexW3190893860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.