Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34351987›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Using the first nationwide survey on non-communicable disease risk factors and different definitions to evaluate the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in Burkina Faso.

Kadari Cissé, Délwendé René Séverin Samadoulougou, Joel Dofinissery Bognini, Tiga David Kangoye, Fati Kirakoya-Samadoulougou

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kadari CisséCentre de Recherche en Epidémiologie, Biostatistiques et Recherche Clinique, Ecole de Santé Publique, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-0219-0197
Délwendé René Séverin SamadoulougouService de Médecine, Centre Hospitalier Régional de Banfora, Banfora, Burkina Faso.ORCID 0000-0002-0171-393X
Joel Dofinissery BogniniCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique, Unité de Recherche Clinique de Nanoro, Institut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.ORCID 0000-0002-8465-2895
Tiga David KangoyeInstitut national de santé publique (INSP), CNRFP, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Fati Kirakoya-SamadoulougouCentre de Recherche en Epidémiologie, Biostatistiques et Recherche Clinique, Ecole de Santé Publique, Université libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique · BFCentre National de Recherche et de Formation sur le Paludisme · BF

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe burden of cardiovascular diseases is rising in the developing world including Sub-Saharan Africa. The rapid rise of cardiovascular disease burden is in part due to undetected and uncontrolled cardiovascular risk factors. The clustering of metabolic syndrome (MetS) components is associated with a high risk of cardiovascular diseases. This complex biochemical disorder is still poorly studied in western Africa. In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its determinants among the adult population in Burkina Faso.

methodsWe performed a secondary analysis of the data from the first national survey on non-communicable diseases risk factors using the World Health Organization (WHO) Stepwise approach. We included 4019 study participants aged 25 to 64 years. The metabolic syndrome prevalence was estimated using six different definitions.

resultsThe mean age was 38.6±11.1 years. Women represented 52.4% and three quarters (75%) lived in rural areas. The overall prevalence of metabolic syndrome according to the different definitions was 1.6% (95%CI:1.1-2.2) for the American College of Endocrinology, 1.8% (95%CI: 1.3-2.4) for the WHO, 4.3% (95%CI:3.5-5.2) for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III, 6.2% (95%CI: 5.1-7.6) for the AAH/NHBI, 9.6%(95%CI: 8.1-11.3) for the International Diabetes Federation and 10.9% (95%: 9.2-12.7) for the Joint Interim Statement. The metabolic syndrome components with the highest prevalence were low High density lipoprotein (63.3%), abdominal obesity (22.3%) and hypertension (20.6%). People living in urban areas and those with older age have higher prevalence of metabolic syndrome regardless of the definition used.

conclusionOur findings suggest various levels of prevalence of MetS according to the definition used. Identifying the most appropriate criteria for MetS among the adult population is important to early detect and treat this syndrome and its components at the primary health care level to control the rising burden of cardiovascular diseases in the context of ongoing epidemiological transition in the country.

Indexed as

AdultBurkina FasoFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMetabolic SyndromeMiddle AgedNoncommunicable DiseasesPrevalenceRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID34351987
PMCPMC8341491
OpenAlexW3192395449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.