Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34351936›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Effect of wall type, delayed mortality and mosquito age on the residual efficacy of a clothianidin-based indoor residual spray formulation (SumiShield™ 50WG) in southern Mozambique.

Helena Marti-Soler, Mara Máquina, Mercy Opiyo, Celso Alafo, Ellie Sherrard-Smith, Arlindo Malheia, Nelson Cuamba, Charfudin Sacoor, Regina Rabinovich, Pedro Aide and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Helena Marti-SolerBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Mara MáquinaCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Maputo, Mozambique.
Mercy OpiyoBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Celso AlafoCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Maputo, Mozambique.
Ellie Sherrard-SmithMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Arlindo MalheiaCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Maputo, Mozambique.
Nelson CuambaPrograma Nacional de Controlo da Malária, Ministério da Saúde, Maputo, Mozambique.
Charfudin SacoorCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Maputo, Mozambique.
Regina RabinovichBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Pedro AideCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Maputo, Mozambique.
Francisco SaúteCentro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Maputo, Mozambique.
Krijn PaaijmansBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4837-2818

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1Medical Research Council MR/T041986/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indoor residual spraying (IRS) is one of the main malaria vector control strategies in Mozambique alongside the distribution of insecticide treated nets. As part of the national insecticide resistance management strategy, Mozambique introduced SumiShield™ 50WG, a third generation IRS product, in 2018. Its residual efficacy was assessed in southern Mozambique during the 2018-2019 malaria season. Using a susceptible Anopheles arabiensis strain, residual efficacy was assessed on two different wall surfaces, cement and mud-plastered walls, using standard WHO (World Health Organization) cone bioassay tests at three different heights. Female mosquitoes of two age groups (2-5 and 13-26 day old) were exposed for 30 minutes, after which mortality was observed 24h, 48h, 72h, and 96h and 120h post-exposure to assess (delayed) mortality. Lethal times (LT) 90, LT50 and LT10 were estimated using Bayesian models. Mortality 24h post exposure was consistently below 80%, the current WHO threshold value for effective IRS, in both young and old mosquitoes, regardless of wall surface type. Considering delayed mortality, residual efficacies (mosquito mortality equal or greater than 80%) ranged from 1.5 to ≥12.5 months, with the duration depending on mortality time post exposure, wall type and mosquito age. Looking at mortality 72h after exposure, residual efficacy was between 6.5 and 9.5 months, depending on wall type and mosquito age. The LT50 and LT10 (i.e. 90% of the mosquitoes survive exposure to the insecticides) values were consistently higher for older mosquitoes (except for LT10 values for 48h and 72h post-exposure mortality) and ranged from 0.9 to 5.8 months and 0.2 to 7.8 months for LT50 and LT10, respectively. The present study highlights the need for assessing mosquito mortality beyond the currently recommended 24h post exposure. Failure to do so may lead to underestimation of the residual efficacy of IRS products, as delayed mortality will lead to a further reduction in mosquito vector populations and potentially negatively impact disease transmission. Monitoring residual efficacy on relevant wall surfaces, including old mosquitoes that are ultimately responsible for malaria transmission, and assessing delayed mortalities are critical to provide accurate and actionable data to guide vector control programmes.

Indexed as

AnophelesAerosolsAge FactorsAnimalsFemaleGuanidinesHousingInsecticidesMosquito ControlMozambiqueNeonicotinoidsThiazolesAerosolsclothianidinGuanidinesInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsThiazoles

Identifiers

PMID34351936
PMCPMC8341595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.