Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34351814›Full record

ArticleJCO global oncology2021

Assessment of Cervical Cancer Prevention and Treatment Infrastructure in Belize.

Shane S Neibart, Tiffany A Smith, Jennifer H Fang, Taylor Anderson, Abha Kulkarni, Jennifer Tsui, Shawna V Hudson, Gregory L Peck, Joseph S Hanna, Natalia Largaespada Beer and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO global oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Shane S NeibartRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.ORCID 0000-0003-1294-6082
Tiffany A SmithRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
Jennifer H FangRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
Taylor AndersonUniversity of Queensland Ochsner Clinical School, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Abha KulkarniRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.ORCID 0000-0003-2365-6582
Jennifer TsuiUniversity of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.
Shawna V HudsonRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.ORCID 0000-0002-7026-0743
Gregory L PeckRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
Joseph S HannaRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
Natalia Largaespada BeerMinistry of Health, Belmopan, Belize.ORCID 0000-0002-1543-5125
Mark H EinsteinRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Belize · BZUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

New Jersey Alliance for Clinical Translational Science: NJ ACTSUL1TR003017 · NCATS · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL/HEALTH SCIENCES-RBHS · PI PANETTIERI, REYNOLD ALEXANDER · 2019 to 2023
$28.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBelize has one of the highest cervical cancer burdens among Latin American and Caribbean countries, despite the implementation of national policies to increase access to prevention and treatment services. This study evaluates the policies, infrastructure, and workforce of the cervical cancer management system in Belize to inform capacity building efforts.

methodsIn 2018, health facility assessments were conducted across all six districts of Belize at the national pathology facility and 12 public facilities identified as critical to cervical cancer control. Human and infrastructure resource availability and existing policies related to cervical cancer screening and treatment services were assessed through a structured instrument.

resultsThe public cervical cancer screening workforce in Belize consists of 75 primary care nurses and physicians-one per 1,076 screening-eligible women, with 44% conducting rural outreach. All districts have at least one screening facility, but 50% perform screening services only once per week. Colposcopy and loop electrical excision procedures are available in three and four districts, respectively; radical hysterectomy and chemotherapy are available in two districts; and radiation therapy is unavailable. Of essential pathology equipment, 38.5% were present and functional, 23% were present but nonfunctional, and 38.5% were unavailable. Additionally, 35% of supplies were unavailable at the time of assessment, and 75% were unavailable at least once in the 12 months before assessment.

conclusionPublic-sector cervical cancer management services differ among districts of Belize, with tertiary service availability concentrated in the largest district. Screening, outreach, and pathology are limited mostly by resource availability. This study characterizes the current capacity of services in Belize and pinpoints health system components for future investment and capacity-building efforts.

Indexed as

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsBelizeColposcopyDelivery of Health CareEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID34351814
PMCPMC8389877
OpenAlexW3187548570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.