Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34351812›Full record

ArticleJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2021

The Neural Underpinnings of Processing Newly Taught Semantic Information: The Role of Retrieval Practice.

Eileen Haebig, Laurence B Leonard, Patricia Deevy, Jennifer Schumaker, Jeffrey D Karpicke, Christine Weber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eileen HaebigDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
Laurence B LeonardDepartment of Speech, Language, & Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Patricia DeevyDepartment of Speech, Language, & Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Jennifer SchumakerDepartment of Speech, Language, & Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Jeffrey D KarpickeDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Christine WeberDepartment of Speech, Language, & Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.

Funding

Retrieval-Based Word Learning in Specific Language ImpairmentR01DC014708 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey Karpicke · 2016 to 2026
$5.8M
Diversity SupplementT32DC000030 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI Arielle Borovsky, Preeti M. Sivasankar · 1991 to 2026
$5.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014708NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Recent behavioral studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of implementing retrieval practice into learning tasks for children. Such approaches have revealed that repeated spaced retrieval (RSR) is particularly effective in promoting children's learning of word form and meaning information. This study further examines how retrieval practice enhances learning of word meaning information at the behavioral and neural levels. Method Twenty typically developing preschool children were taught novel words using an RSR learning schedule for some words and an immediate retrieval (IR) learning schedule for other words. In addition to the label, children were taught two arbitrary semantic features for each item. Following the teaching phase, children's learning was tested using recall tests. In addition, during the 1-week follow-up, children were presented with pictures and an auditory sentence that correctly labeled the item but stated correct or incorrect semantic information. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were time locked to the onset of the words noting the semantic feature. Children provided verbal judgments of whether the semantic feature was correctly paired with the item. Results Children recalled more labels and semantic features for items that had been taught in the RSR learning schedule relative to the IR learning schedule. ERPs also differentiated the learning schedules. Mismatching label-meaning pairings elicited an N400 and late positive component (LPC) for both learning conditions; however, mismatching RSR pairs elicited an N400 with an earlier onset and an LPC with a longer duration, relative to IR mismatching label-meaning pairings. These ERP timing differences indicated that the children were more efficient in processing words that were taught in the RSR schedule relative to the IR learning schedule. Conclusions Spaced retrieval practice promotes learning of both word form and meaning information. The findings lay the necessary groundwork for better understanding of processing newly learned semantic information in preschool children. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.15063060.

Indexed as

Language Development DisordersSemanticsChild, PreschoolElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleVerbal Learning

Identifiers

PMID34351812
PMCPMC8740735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.