Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34351787›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2021

Prognostic Model for De Novo and Recurrent Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Carlos H Barcenas, Juhee Song, Rashmi K Murthy, Akshara S Raghavendra, Yisheng Li, Limin Hsu, Robert W Carlson, Debu Tripathy, Gabriel N Hortobagyi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Schwannoma of the Appendix Mimicking a Metastatic Breast Cancer:Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Novel Prognostic Staging System for Patients With De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carlos H BarcenasDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0001-5377-9167
Juhee SongDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-8688-4104
Rashmi K MurthyDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-0103-4718
Akshara S RaghavendraDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-6425-4400
Yisheng LiDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0001-9847-8544
Limin HsuDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Robert W CarlsonNational Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), Plymouth Meeting, PA.ORCID 0000-0003-2011-6695
Debu TripathyDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-5711-2404
Gabriel N HortobagyiDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.ORCID 0000-0002-4873-4412
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMetastatic breast cancer (MBC) has a heterogeneous clinical course. We sought to develop a prognostic model for overall survival (OS) that incorporated contemporary tumor and clinical factors for estimating individual prognosis.

methodsWe identified patients with MBC from our institution diagnosed between 1998 and 2017. We developed OS prognostic models by Cox regression using demographic, tumor, and treatment variables. We assessed model predictive accuracy and estimated annual OS probabilities. We evaluated model discrimination and prediction calibration using an external validation data set from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

resultsWe identified 10,655 patients. A model using age at diagnosis, race or ethnicity, hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 subtype, de novo versus recurrent MBC categorized by metastasis-free interval, Karnofsky performance status, organ involvement, frontline biotherapy, frontline hormone therapy, and the interaction between variables significantly improved predictive accuracy (C-index, 0.731; 95% CI, 0.724 to 0.739) compared with a model with only hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status (C-index, 0.617; 95% CI, 0.609 to 0.626). The extended Cox regression model consisting of six independent models, for < 3, 3-14, 14-20, 20-33, 33-61, and ≥ 61 months, estimated up to 5 years of annual OS probabilities. The selected multifactor model had good discriminative ability but suboptimal calibration in the group of 2,334 National Comprehensive Cancer Network patients. A recalibration model that replaced the baseline survival function with the average of those from the training and validation data improved predictions across both data sets.

conclusionWe have generated and validated a robust prognostic OS model for MBC. This model can be used in clinical decision making and stratification in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisProportional Hazards Models

Identifiers

PMID34351787
PMCPMC8807018
OpenAlexW3188727175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.