ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2021
Prognostic Model for De Novo and Recurrent Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in older patients with metastatic breast cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Development and validation of explainable machine learning models for the prediction of survival in patients with M1 breast cancer.Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Clinical subtypes in breast cancer patients with brain metastases from an ambispective registry of advanced breast cancer, GEICAM/2014-03 (RegistEM).Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
- A Pragmatic Grouping Model for Bone-Only De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer (MetS Protocol MF22-03).Cancers · 2025Article
- Patterns of presentation, treatment, and survival among older adults with metastatic breast cancer: Results from a large prospective registry.Journal of geriatric oncology · 2025Article
- Schwannoma of the Appendix Mimicking a Metastatic Breast Cancer:Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2025Article
- Evaluating generalizability of oncology trial results to real-world patients using machine learning-based trial emulations.Nature medicine · 2025Article
- Penalized landmark supermodels (penLM) for dynamic prediction for time-to-event outcomes in high-dimensional data.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Predictive Modeling of Long-Term Survivors with Stage IV Breast Cancer Using the SEER-Medicare Dataset.Cancers · 2024Article
- Survival After Contralateral Axillary Metastasis in Breast Cancer.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Treatment Patterns and Health Outcomes among Patients with HER2 IHC0/-Low Metastatic or Recurrent Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2024Article
- Software Application Profile: dynamicLM-a tool for performing dynamic risk prediction using a landmark supermodel for survival data under competing risks.International journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
- Effects of socioeconomic status and race on survival and treatment in metastatic breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2023Article
- Novel Prognostic Staging System for Patients With De Novo Metastatic Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMetastatic breast cancer (MBC) has a heterogeneous clinical course. We sought to develop a prognostic model for overall survival (OS) that incorporated contemporary tumor and clinical factors for estimating individual prognosis.
methodsWe identified patients with MBC from our institution diagnosed between 1998 and 2017. We developed OS prognostic models by Cox regression using demographic, tumor, and treatment variables. We assessed model predictive accuracy and estimated annual OS probabilities. We evaluated model discrimination and prediction calibration using an external validation data set from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.
resultsWe identified 10,655 patients. A model using age at diagnosis, race or ethnicity, hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 subtype, de novo versus recurrent MBC categorized by metastasis-free interval, Karnofsky performance status, organ involvement, frontline biotherapy, frontline hormone therapy, and the interaction between variables significantly improved predictive accuracy (C-index, 0.731; 95% CI, 0.724 to 0.739) compared with a model with only hormone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status (C-index, 0.617; 95% CI, 0.609 to 0.626). The extended Cox regression model consisting of six independent models, for < 3, 3-14, 14-20, 20-33, 33-61, and ≥ 61 months, estimated up to 5 years of annual OS probabilities. The selected multifactor model had good discriminative ability but suboptimal calibration in the group of 2,334 National Comprehensive Cancer Network patients. A recalibration model that replaced the baseline survival function with the average of those from the training and validation data improved predictions across both data sets.
conclusionWe have generated and validated a robust prognostic OS model for MBC. This model can be used in clinical decision making and stratification in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.