ArticleCancer2021
What is empathy? Oncology patient perspectives on empathic clinician behaviors.
Article in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring Communication Dynamics Between Patients and Healthcare Providers in Oncology: A Systematic Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Pooled it
- Core Competencies for Serious Illness Conversations: An Integrative Systematic Review.Journal of palliative care · 2024Pooled it
- Educational efficacy of medical humanities in empathy of medical students and healthcare professionals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2023Pooled it
- Empathic Communication in Specialty Palliative Care Encounters: An Analysis of Opportunities and Responses.Journal of palliative medicine · 2022Trial
- Patients' Voices of Care Encounters and Organisational Influences on Existential Suffering in Cancer Care: A Qualitative Study.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2026Article
- Empathy, access, and delays: determinants of oncology care satisfaction in Polish academic and nonacademic hospitals.The oncologist · 2026Article
- What is Artificial Intelligence (AI) "Empathy"? A Study Comparing ChatGPT and Physician Responses on an Online Forum.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Learning by Doing: Chinese Male Nursing Students' Experiences of Developing and Demonstrating Empathy When Caring for Patients in the Oncology Wards.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Self-reported patient experiences in a peer-support community: What do cancer patients value?Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Assessment of empathy by simulated patients: Adaptation and validation of a new instrument.GMS journal for medical education · 2026Article
- Article
- Evaluation of Cancer Survivors' Experience of Using AI-Based Conversational Tools: Qualitative Study.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- Spiritual needs and satisfaction with life: an exploration of mediating pathways.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Patient and Practitioner Perspectives on the Definition and Measurement of Therapeutic Empathy: Qualitative Study.Journal of participatory medicine · 2025Article
- Timely integration of palliative care into standard oncology care: An interview study with clinicians and patients with incurable cancer.Palliative & supportive care · 2025Article
- Healing relationships between patients from visible minority groups and their clinicians in palliative care: Protocol for an interpretive description study.Palliative care and social practice · 2025Article
- Holistic Person-Centered Care in Radiotherapy: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- Digital clinical empathy in a live chat: multiple findings from a formative qualitative study and usability tests.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- The influence of "bad news" and "neutral/good news" on patients' perception of physician empathy during oncology consultations.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Physicians' attention to patients' communication cues can improve patient satisfaction with care and perception of physicians' empathy.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOncology patients and physicians value empathy because of its association with improved health outcomes. Common measures of empathy lack consistency and were developed without direct input from patients. Because of their intense engagement with health care systems, oncology patients may have unique perspectives on what behaviors signal empathy in a clinical setting.
methodsAs part of a cross-sectional study of patient perspectives on clinician empathy at an academic cancer center in the northeastern United States, the authors solicited up to 10 free-text responses to an open-ended question about what clinician behaviors define empathy.
resultsThe authors categorized open-ended responses from 89 oncology patients into 5 categories representing 14 themes. These categories were relationship sensitivity, focus on the whole person, communication, clinician attributes, and institutional resources and care processes. Frequently represented themes, including listening, understanding, and attention to emotions and what matters most, aligned with existing measures of empathy; behaviors that were not well represented among existing measures included qualities of information sharing and other communication elements. Patients also associated clinician demeanor, accessibility, and competence with empathy.
conclusionsOncology patients' perspectives on empathy highlight clinician behaviors and attributes that may help to refine patient experience measures and may be adopted by clinicians and cancer centers to enhance patient care and outcomes. High-quality communication skills training can promote active listening and paying attention to the whole person. A system-level focus on delivering empathic care may improve patients' experiences and outcomes. LAY SUMMARY: Oncology patients' responses to an open-ended question about empathic clinician behavior have revealed insights into a variety of behaviors that are perceived as demonstrative of empathy. These include behaviors that imply sensitivity to the clinician-patient relationship, such as listening and understanding and attention to the whole person. Participants valued caring communication and demeanor and clinician accessibility. Perspective taking was not common among answers. Many existing measures of clinical care quality do not include the behaviors cited by patients as empathic. These results can inform efforts to refine quality measures of empathy-associated behaviors in clinical practice. Cancer centers can use skills training to improve elements of communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.