Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34351579›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Comparison between Aliivibrio fischeri and activated sludge microorganisms in the evaluation of the toxic pollutants of leachates from Brazilian landfills.

Alyne Moraes Costa, Marllon Robert Dos Santos Valentim, Livia Ferreira da Silva, Ronei de Almeida, Sarah Dario Alves Daflon, Bianca Ramalho Quintaes, Juacyara Carbonelli Campos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A review on membrane concentrate management from landfill leachate treatment plants: The relevance of resource recovery to close the leachate treatment loop.Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alyne Moraes CostaSchool of Chemistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Athos da Silveira Ramos Avenue 149, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-909, Brazil.
Marllon Robert Dos Santos ValentimSchool of Chemistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Athos da Silveira Ramos Avenue 149, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-909, Brazil.
Livia Ferreira da SilvaSchool of Chemistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Athos da Silveira Ramos Avenue 149, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-909, Brazil.
Ronei de AlmeidaSchool of Chemistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Athos da Silveira Ramos Avenue 149, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-909, Brazil.
Sarah Dario Alves DaflonSchool of Chemistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Athos da Silveira Ramos Avenue 149, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-909, Brazil.
Bianca Ramalho QuintaesMunicipal Company of Urban Cleaning of Rio de Janeiro, Américo de Souza Braga street 647, Rio de Janeiro, 22783-385, Brazil.
Juacyara Carbonelli CamposSchool of Chemistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Athos da Silveira Ramos Avenue 149, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-909, Brazil. juacyara@eq.ufrj.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3988-5649
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRHospital Municipal Souza Aguiar · BR

Funding

CAPES 001FAPERJ E-26/010.001868/2015FAPERJ E-26/010.002468/2019FAPERJ E-26/202.923/2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecotoxicological assessment of landfill leachate has become a priority to determine its impacts on the ecosystem. Toxicity assays with microorganisms stand out due to their quick response, low cost and ease of testing. In this context, the present study evaluated the acute toxic effects of leachates from two landfills of different ages and modes of operation to bacterium Aliivibrio fischeri and activated sludge microorganisms and the ammonia nitrogen and humic substances (HS) sensitivity to these organisms. Reductions greater than 30% in leachate toxicity were observed after ammonia removal for A. fischeri and activated sludge microorganisms. After 97% removal of HS, the greater reductions in toxicity (44.28 to 79.82%) were verified for microbial species studied, indicating that the organic compounds (measured as chemical oxygen demand, total organic carbon and humic substances) were the primary pollutants responsible for the toxicity of the leachates. Concerning the organisms studied, A. fischeri showed greater sensitivity to the leachates' pollutants compared to the activated sludge microorganisms. Nevertheless, a strong correlation was observed between A. fischeri and activated sludge microorganisms' toxicity responses, suggesting that respirometry assay can be used to determine leachate toxicity.

Indexed as

Environmental PollutantsWater Pollutants, ChemicalAliivibrio fischeriEcosystemSewageToxicity TestsWaste Disposal FacilitiesEnvironmental PollutantsSewageWater Pollutants, ChemicalAcute toxicityAmmonia removalBioluminescence inhibitionHumic substancesLandfill leachatePrincipal component analysis (PCA)Respirometry assay

Identifiers

PMID34351579
OpenAlexW3175807624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.