Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34351566›Full record

Trial reportAdvances in therapy2021

Comparison of Viscoelastic Substance Injection Versus Air Filling in the Anterior Chamber During Foldable Capsular Vitreous Body (FCVB) Implant Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Zhongyu Zhang, Shujie Liu, Fang Xie, Bo Jiang, Meng Sun, Dawei Sun

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Advances in therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Foldable capsular vitreous body indications, complications, and outcomes: a systematic review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of Foldable Capsular Vitreous Body Implantation Surgery.International journal of general medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zhongyu ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, No.246 Xuefu Road, Harbin, 150086, China.
Shujie LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, China.
Fang XieDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, China.
Bo JiangDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, No.246 Xuefu Road, Harbin, 150086, China.
Meng SunDepartment of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150086, China.
Dawei SunDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, No.246 Xuefu Road, Harbin, 150086, China. sun.dawei@hotmail.com.
First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University · CNHarbin Medical University · CNMinistry of Education of the People's Republic of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo compare the outcomes of viscoelastic substance injection with air filling in the anterior chamber during foldable capsular vitreous body (FCVB) implant surgery in patients with severe retinal disease.

methodsThirty eyes with severe retinal diseases were randomly divided into two groups. In the viscoelastic group, 0.15-0.2 mL of 1.7% sodium hyaluronate was injected into the anterior chamber after FCVB implantation; in the air group, the anterior chamber was maintained by filling the air after FCVB implant surgery. The eyes of treated patients were examined during a 24-week follow-up appointment. Data, including intraocular pressure (IOP), the difference between preoperative and postoperative IOP, and postoperative complications, were recorded.

resultsData collected from 27 eyes were used in the final analysis. The IOP of the air group was lower than that of the viscoelastic group from the first to third postoperative day (P < 0.01). Moreover, the difference between preoperative and postoperative IOP in the viscoelastic group was significantly smaller than that in the air group from the first to third postoperative day (P < 0.01). After the 1st postoperative week, postoperative IOP values were similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). Postoperative complications in the air group and the viscoelastic group included corneal blood staining (1 eye vs. 0 eyes), transient postoperative diffuse hemorrhage (5 eyes vs. 1 eye), inflammation reaction (9 eyes vs. 4 eyes), and postoperative fibrin exudation (4 eyes vs. 1 eye), respectively.

conclusionThe use of viscoelastic substances in the anterior chamber during FCVB implant surgery was associated with less fluctuation in postoperative IOP and could reduce postoperative complications. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR-TNC-00000396.

Indexed as

Anterior ChamberVitreous BodyHumansIntraocular PressurePostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesTonometry, OcularViscoelastic SubstancesViscoelastic SubstancesAnterior chamberFCVBIOPRetinal diseasesViscoelastic

Identifiers

PMID34351566
PMCPMC8408088
OpenAlexW3189334188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.