Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34351531›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2021

Steady-state

Rebekah J Nixon, Sascha H Kranen, Anni Vanhatalo, Andrew M Jones

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Metabolic, V̇OPhysiological reports · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A critical review of critical power.European journal of applied physiology · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebekah J NixonSport and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX12LU, UK.
Sascha H KranenSport and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX12LU, UK.
Anni VanhataloSport and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX12LU, UK.
Andrew M JonesSport and Health Sciences, University of Exeter, St. Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX12LU, UK. a.m.jones@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2082-1709
University of Exeter · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The metabolic boundary separating the heavy-intensity and severe-intensity exercise domains is of scientific and practical interest but there is controversy concerning whether the maximal lactate steady state (MLSS) or critical power (synonymous with critical speed, CS) better represents this boundary. We measured the running speeds at MLSS and CS and investigated their ability to discriminate speeds at which

Indexed as

AccelerationExercise TestHumansLactic AcidMaleOxygen ConsumptionPhysical FitnessRunningYoung AdultLactic AcidEnduranceLactateOxygen uptakePerformancePhysiologyThreshold

Identifiers

PMID34351531
PMCPMC8505327
OpenAlexW3188635468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.