Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34351383›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2021

Selecting gene features for unsupervised analysis of single-cell gene expression data.

Jie Sheng, Wei Vivian Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The scINSIGHT Package for Integrating Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data from Different Biological Conditions.Journal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Identification ofComputational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jie ShengDepartment of Statistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Wei Vivian LiDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.

Funding

Multimodal profiling of neurons in 3D human cortical organoids using patch-seqR21MH126420 · NIMH · RBHS-ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI LI, WEI VIVIAN, PANG, ZHIPING P. · 2021 to 2022
$426k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH126420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) technologies facilitate the characterization of transcriptomic landscapes in diverse species, tissues, and cell types with unprecedented molecular resolution. In order to evaluate various biological hypotheses using high-dimensional single-cell gene expression data, most computational and statistical methods depend on a gene feature selection step to identify genes with high biological variability and reduce computational complexity. Even though many gene selection methods have been developed for scRNA-seq analysis, there lacks a systematic comparison of the assumptions, statistical models, and selection criteria used by these methods. In this article, we summarize and discuss 17 computational methods for selecting gene features in unsupervised analysis of single-cell gene expression data, with unified notations and statistical frameworks. Our discussion provides a useful summary to help practitioners select appropriate methods based on their assumptions and applicability, and to assist method developers in designing new computational tools for unsupervised learning of scRNA-seq data.

Indexed as

Gene ExpressionComputational BiologyHumansSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell Analysisfeature selectionhighly variable genessingle-cell genomicsunsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID34351383
PMCPMC8574996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.