Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34351258›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical microbiology2021

Increasingly limited options for the treatment of enteric fever in travellers returning to England, 2014-2019: a cross-sectional analytical study.

M Trent Herdman, Basel Karo, Jayshree Dave, Parisha Katwa, Joanne Freedman, Vivienne Do Nascimento, Hilary Kirkbride, Marie Anne Chattaway, Gauri Godbole, Sooria Balasegaram

Open access · hybridAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Risk Factors for Typhoid Fever: Systematic Review.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Typhoid fever.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genetic context ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M Trent HerdmanNational Infection Service, Public Health England, England, UK.
Basel KaroNational Infection Service, Public Health England, England, UK.
Jayshree DaveNational Infection Service, Public Health England, England, UK.
Parisha KatwaNational Infection Service, Public Health England, England, UK.
Joanne FreedmanNational Infection Service, Public Health England, England, UK.
Vivienne Do NascimentoNational Infection Service, Public Health England, England, UK.
Hilary KirkbrideNational Infection Service, Public Health England, England, UK.
Marie Anne ChattawayNational Infection Service, Public Health England, England, UK.
Gauri GodboleNational Infection Service, Public Health England, England, UK.
Sooria BalasegaramNational Infection Service, Public Health England, England, UK.
Public Health England · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

TravelTravel-Related IllnessAdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolClinical Decision-MakingCross-Sectional StudiesDisease ManagementDrug Resistance, BacterialEnglandFemaleHealth Care SurveysHistory, 21st CenturyAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial resistanceEnteric feverParatyphoidTravel medicineTyphoid

Identifiers

PMID34351258
PMCPMC8513630
OpenAlexW3188469107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.